- Original Message -
From: "sebb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Commons Developers List"
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2008 11:48 AM
Subject: Re: [jelly] Is jelly still in development vs. Open/FederatedCommons
On 11/11/2008, John Spackman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi Henri,
Using Henri's analogies from his recent blog, I took Jelly home from the
Commons a couple of years ago and we're now ready to "put it in the
window
and see if we're invited to play" [...snip...]
As below - analogy was about other Apache projects but probably
applies here as you say.
keep up with patches and commits in order for you to
become a committer.
Henri, can you please agree that we "try to make jelly enter a
maintained mode", within a month or so, before we show "not actively
maintained" on the web-page?
thanks in advance
paul
Le 11-nov.-08
[jelly] Is jelly still in development vs. Open/FederatedCommons
John,
Le 10-nov.-08 à 07:11, John Spackman a écrit :
Yes, kind of - I've only recently come across Git and the concept of DVCS
but it was my intention to look at using a DVCS for this.
But DVCS "only" does source code - setting u
Hi Russel,
Of course graceful demise is entirely appropriate. The question I have
is whether putting effort into maintaining a demising system is worth it
compared to putting that effort into transferring to a different (more
appropriate, in my view) technology for dealing with the problem. Th
Hi Russel,
Forgive me for butting in on a conversation but . . .
Anytime :)
Isn't this whole Subversion centralism problem solved by using a DVCS
such as Bazaar, or Git -- and soon, I gather, Mercurial.
Yes, kind of - I've only recently come across Git and the concept of DVCS
but it was m
, November 09, 2008 8:26 PM
Subject: Re: [jelly] Is jelly still in development vs. Open/Federated
Commons
Le 09-nov.-08 à 05:35, John Spackman a écrit :
I agree that the website needs some changes although I had thought that
this was largely for broken links and for a consistent left- hand si
tate.
(correct getting-started, tag-ref somewhat consistent, ...).
How doable would it be for you to tackle such repair?
I could then try to apply a patch you submit to jira.
I am not sure (and hope not) that the web-site can only be fixed by
the migration to maven2...
paul
Le 08-nov.-08 à 10:
Hi,
We're still actively using Jelly and while the usefulness of some of the
extension modules may be debatable (and definitely without wishing to enter
into a debate of whether it is appropriate to have "executable" data), as a
core tool Jelly has allowed us to rapidly produce pluggable langu
