Re: I'm looking for "State of the Feather" filetype:pptx

Just FYI, here's my slides - https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1ScAzW37oEYnaYR8yNZCyJlk_lnssSAXopeZ0NUmPoeg/edit?usp=sharing On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 4:11 AM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote: > You are receiving these mails because you subscribed to the mailing list. If > you want to unsub

Re: Thank You for Joining Pivotal at ApacheCon and Welcome Apache Geode!

On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 4:19 PM, jan i wrote: >> I am happy to let me badge be scanned for ACEU, if pivotall becomes a >> sponsor and even more if the swag is something useful Working on it! Thanks, Roman.

Re: projects-new.a.o updates

Orc is listed as retired instead of active. .. Owen > On May 14, 2015, at 15:38, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > > Hi, > > I seriously updated content: > - *every* TLP is listed, even when no DOAP file has been written [1] > - TLP project can be displayed, even without DOAP and provide link to every >

Re: Thank You for Joining Pivotal at ApacheCon and Welcome Apache Geode!

On Friday, May 15, 2015, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > Turns out it was an over-eager corp. marketing that > used sources unrelated to ACNA to figure out "who may > be interested in Geode" (whatever that means). > > Apologies for the noise, my initial thought was exactly > along the lines of Melissa'

RE: Thank You for Joining Pivotal at ApacheCon and Welcome Apache Geode!

Fair enough. It happens. I suspect the real concern was that the reg list might have been shared. Thanks for confirming that wasn't the case. Ross Sent from my Windows Phone From: Roman Shaposhnik Sent: ‎5/‎14/‎2015 4:12 PM To: ComDev

Re: Thank You for Joining Pivotal at ApacheCon and Welcome Apache Geode!

Turns out it was an over-eager corp. marketing that used sources unrelated to ACNA to figure out "who may be interested in Geode" (whatever that means). Apologies for the noise, my initial thought was exactly along the lines of Melissa's note: whoever got scanned (which in my mind would be a total

Re: Thank You for Joining Pivotal at ApacheCon and Welcome Apache Geode!

Just to balance the ladder a little bit. Even though I am mentor for the newest Pivotal kid in town, I did not receive the mail. I know that LF has a very strict policy. rgds jan I On Friday, May 15, 2015, Shane Curcuru wrote: > On 5/14/15 3:41 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > Hrm Is this SP

Re: Fwd: Thank You for Joining Pivotal at ApacheCon and Welcome Apache Geode!

On 5/14/15 3:41 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Hrm Is this SPAM due to Pivotal getting my Email via the ACUS roster? My understanding of LF event policy (who runs the reg and conference for us) is that they do *not* share email lists with vendors. I got the below email also, to my @apache.org ema

projects-new.a.o updates

Hi, I seriously updated content: - *every* TLP is listed, even when no DOAP file has been written [1] - TLP project can be displayed, even without DOAP and provide link to every sub-project [2] - when a TLP has a "main sub-project" with its DOAP file, data from TLP and data from DOAP subproject

Re: Fwd: Thank You for Joining Pivotal at ApacheCon and Welcome Apache Geode!

Good question.  Or did you get anything from their booth that required them to scan your badge? From: Jim Jagielski To: dev@community.apache.org Cc: "" Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2015 3:41 PM Subject: Fwd: Thank You for Joining Pivotal at ApacheCon and Welcome Apache Geode! Hrm

Fwd: Thank You for Joining Pivotal at ApacheCon and Welcome Apache Geode!

Hrm Is this SPAM due to Pivotal getting my Email via the ACUS roster? Disappointed. > Begin forwarded message: > > From: Andrea Rojas > Subject: Thank You for Joining Pivotal at ApacheCon and Welcome Apache Geode! > Date: May 14, 2015 at 10:51:16 AM EDT > To: j...@apache.org > Reply-To: anr

Re: Reg -Join Community

for JSR-303 and JSR-349 please take a look at http://bval.apache.org Happy about any contributions! txs and LieGrue, strub > Am 14.05.2015 um 19:49 schrieb Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo > : > > On Sat, 09 May 2015 09:12:12 -0300, James Carman > wrote: > >> How does this framework compare wi

Re: Reg -Join Community

On Sat, 09 May 2015 09:12:12 -0300, James Carman wrote: How does this framework compare with the standards-based JavaBean validation from work? Yep, JSRs 303 (Bean Validation 1.0) and 349 (Bean Validation 1.1). On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 5:03 AM Karthik Rajendran wrote: Hi All, I