[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.5.8/2.6.5/2.7.2

2013-01-07 Thread Daniel Kulp
We have 9 +1 votes, plenty of them binding. There is still an outstanding issue with the DOSGi stuff with Karaf 2.3, but we're not sure yet where that problem is. Aki also has a build issue, but I cannot reproduce it. We can trace that further for 2.7.3. In any case, this vote passes. I'

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.5.8/2.6.5/2.7.2

2013-01-07 Thread Daniel Kulp
On Jan 7, 2013, at 9:49 AM, Christian Schneider wrote: > I tested on Karaf 2.3.0 and CXF DOSGi 1.4-SNAPSHOT. > > When doing the steps from > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CXF/DOSGi+Apache+Karaf+Feature > I get the exception below. > this may be related to Dan's recent change to d

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.5.8/2.6.5/2.7.2

2013-01-07 Thread Colm O hEigeartaigh
+1. Colm. On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Willem jiang wrote: > +1, > > I did some tests on the camel trunk with cxf-2.7.2, every thing looks good. > > -- > Willem Jiang > > Red Hat, Inc. > FuseSource is now part of Red Hat > Web: http://www.fusesource.com | http://www.redhat.com > Blog: http:/

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.5.8/2.6.5/2.7.2

2013-01-07 Thread Christian Schneider
I tested on Karaf 2.3.0 and CXF DOSGi 1.4-SNAPSHOT. When doing the steps from https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CXF/DOSGi+Apache+Karaf+Feature I get the exception below. this may be related to Dan's recent change to defer loading of the xpath support in Aegis. 2013-01-07 15:48:17,637 |

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.5.8/2.6.5/2.7.2

2013-01-07 Thread Willem jiang
+1, I did some tests on the camel trunk with cxf-2.7.2, every thing looks good. -- Willem Jiang Red Hat, Inc. FuseSource is now part of Red Hat Web: http://www.fusesource.com | http://www.redhat.com Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (http://willemjiang.blogspot.com/) (English)

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.5.8/2.6.5/2.7.2

2013-01-07 Thread Daniel Kulp
Colm just pointed out to me that the 2.5.8 staging repo is wrong. It should be: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecxf-099/ Dan On Jan 4, 2013, at 5:22 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > > We've resolved over 35 issues since 2.7.1. Not a huge number, but > sufficient.

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.5.8/2.6.5/2.7.2

2013-01-07 Thread David Bosschaert
+1 David On 7 January 2013 07:30, Alessio Soldano wrote: > +1 > > Alessio > > On 01/04/2013 11:22 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > > > > > We've resolved over 35 issues since 2.7.1. Not a huge number, but > sufficient. > > > > > > List of issues: > > 2.5.8 > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secur

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.5.8/2.6.5/2.7.2

2013-01-06 Thread Alessio Soldano
+1 Alessio On 01/04/2013 11:22 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > > We've resolved over 35 issues since 2.7.1. Not a huge number, but > sufficient. > > > List of issues: > 2.5.8 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310511&version=12323606 > 2.6.5 > https://issues.

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.5.8/2.6.5/2.7.2

2013-01-06 Thread Sergey Beryozkin
+1 Cheers, Sergey On 05/01/13 01:22, Daniel Kulp wrote: We've resolved over 35 issues since 2.7.1. Not a huge number, but sufficient. List of issues: 2.5.8 https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310511&version=12323606 2.6.5 https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.5.8/2.6.5/2.7.2

2013-01-06 Thread Aki Yoshida
When I ran the mvn test for 2.7.2 and 2.6.5 with jdk1.6.0_37 on Win7, I am getting a test error with org.apache.cxf.transport.http.HTTPConduitURLConnectionTest's testTLSServerParameters. Here the connection instance returned is of class com.sun.net.ssl.internal.www.protocol.https.HttpsURLConnectio

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.5.8/2.6.5/2.7.2

2013-01-05 Thread Freeman Fang
+1 － Freeman(Yue) Fang Red Hat, Inc. FuseSource is now part of Red Hat Web: http://fusesource.com | http://www.redhat.com/ Twitter: freemanfang Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/1473905042 weibo: @Freeman小屋 On 2013-1-5, at 上午6:22, Daniel Kulp wrote: >

AW: Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.5.8/2.6.5/2.7.2

2013-01-05 Thread Oliver Wulff
+1 Oli Ursprüngliche Nachricht Von: Jeff Genender Datum: An: dev@cxf.apache.org Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.5.8/2.6.5/2.7.2 +1 Jeff On Jan 4, 2013, at 3:22 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > > We've resolved over 35 issues since 2.7.1. Not a huge number,

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.5.8/2.6.5/2.7.2

2013-01-04 Thread Jeff Genender
+1 Jeff On Jan 4, 2013, at 3:22 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > > We've resolved over 35 issues since 2.7.1. Not a huge number, but > sufficient. > > > List of issues: > 2.5.8 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310511&version=12323606 > 2.6.5 > https://issu

[VOTE] Apache CXF 2.5.8/2.6.5/2.7.2

2013-01-04 Thread Daniel Kulp
We've resolved over 35 issues since 2.7.1. Not a huge number, but sufficient. List of issues: 2.5.8 https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310511&version=12323606 2.6.5 https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310511&version=12323605 2.