Re: [VOTE] CXF 2.7.13/3.0.2

2014-10-13 Thread Sergey Beryozkin
Hi All, We've had 13 +1 votes, 10 binding and 3 non-binding ones. Freeman voted with -1 but then accepted the issue he referred to was not a CXF 2.7.13/3.0.2 release issue [1]. I'm promoting the artifacts on behalf of Dan Thanks, Sergey [1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/cxf-dev/20

Re: [VOTE] CXF 2.7.13/3.0.2

2014-10-11 Thread Alessio Soldano
+1 Alessio - Original Message - From: "Daniel Kulp" To: dev@cxf.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, October 8, 2014 7:30:52 PM Subject: [VOTE] CXF 2.7.13/3.0.2 This is a vote to release CXF 2.7.13 and 3.0.2.There are over 90 JIRA issues resolved for 3.0.2 which is a lot. Tags: https://gi

Re: [VOTE] CXF 2.7.13/3.0.2

2014-10-11 Thread Krzysztof Sobkowiak
+1 (non-binding) Regards Krzysztof On 08.10.2014 19:30, Daniel Kulp wrote: > This is a vote to release CXF 2.7.13 and 3.0.2.There are over 90 JIRA > issues resolved for 3.0.2 which is a lot. > > Tags: > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cxf.git;a=tag;h=3ec631c97e9eccf62490b176aab6104

Re: [VOTE] CXF 2.7.13/3.0.2

2014-10-10 Thread Jim Ma
+1 On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 10:06 PM, Andrei Shakirin wrote: > +1, > > Andrei. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:dk...@apache.org] > > Sent: Mittwoch, 8. Oktober 2014 19:31 > > To: dev@cxf.apache.org > > Subject: [VOTE] CXF 2.7.13/3.0.2 > > > > > > This is a vote to re

RE: [VOTE] CXF 2.7.13/3.0.2

2014-10-09 Thread Andrei Shakirin
+1, Andrei. > -Original Message- > From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:dk...@apache.org] > Sent: Mittwoch, 8. Oktober 2014 19:31 > To: dev@cxf.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] CXF 2.7.13/3.0.2 > > > This is a vote to release CXF 2.7.13 and 3.0.2.There are over 90 JIRA > issues > resolved for 3.0

Re: [VOTE] CXF 2.7.13/3.0.2

2014-10-09 Thread Andrey Redko
+1! Andriy On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 5:35 AM, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > +1. > > Colm. > > On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 10:26 AM, Christian Schneider < > ch...@die-schneider.net> wrote: > > > +1 to both > > > > Christian > > > > On 08.10.2014 19:30, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > > >> This is a vote to releas

Re: [VOTE] CXF 2.7.13/3.0.2

2014-10-09 Thread Colm O hEigeartaigh
+1. Colm. On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 10:26 AM, Christian Schneider < ch...@die-schneider.net> wrote: > +1 to both > > Christian > > On 08.10.2014 19:30, Daniel Kulp wrote: > >> This is a vote to release CXF 2.7.13 and 3.0.2.There are over 90 JIRA >> issues resolved for 3.0.2 which is a lot. >> >

Re: [VOTE] CXF 2.7.13/3.0.2

2014-10-09 Thread Christian Schneider
+1 to both Christian On 08.10.2014 19:30, Daniel Kulp wrote: This is a vote to release CXF 2.7.13 and 3.0.2.There are over 90 JIRA issues resolved for 3.0.2 which is a lot. Tags: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cxf.git;a=tag;h=3ec631c97e9eccf62490b176aab61044b3b9ab9f https://git

Re: [VOTE] CXF 2.7.13/3.0.2

2014-10-09 Thread Freeman Fang
Ok, seems we need another _3 bundle to fix the problems you point out, create SMX4-1877[1] to track it. As I said in another mail, as this wrong dependency isn't a showstoper for CXF itself and so I will revert change and won't block CXF release [1]https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SMX4-18

Re: [VOTE] CXF 2.7.13/3.0.2

2014-10-09 Thread Freeman Fang
This can cause problem in downstream project like servicemix where use maven-notices-plugin to merge all notices from dependencies in features-repo folder, though not a showstopper for CXF itself. － Freeman(Yue) Fang Red Hat, Inc. FuseSource is now part of Red Hat On 2014-10-9, a

Re: [VOTE] CXF 2.7.13/3.0.2

2014-10-09 Thread Daniel Kulp
On Oct 9, 2014, at 4:48 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > The features file would only pull in the opensaml jar/bundle, not the wrong > xerces. We don’t use “cxf.opensaml.osgi.version” as a version for any sort > of More importantly, the _2 bundle is completely broken. It’s missing all the *.xml

Re: [VOTE] CXF 2.7.13/3.0.2

2014-10-09 Thread Daniel Kulp
The features file would only pull in the opensaml jar/bundle, not the wrong xerces. We don’t use “cxf.opensaml.osgi.version” as a version for any sort of wrote: > I'm sorry to say I have to -1 for both. > > As both CXF 2.7.13 and 3.0.2 use > 2.6.1_1 > however servicemix wrapped opensaml 2.6

Re: [VOTE] CXF 2.7.13/3.0.2

2014-10-08 Thread Freeman Fang
I'm sorry to say I have to -1 for both. As both CXF 2.7.13 and 3.0.2 use 2.6.1_1 however servicemix wrapped opensaml 2.6.1_1 pull in wrong xerces dependency like(because build against the Shibboleth repo but not the maven central repo)[1] org.apache.xerces xercesImpl 2.10.0 ru

Re: [VOTE] CXF 2.7.13/3.0.2

2014-10-08 Thread Sergey Beryozkin
+1 Cheers, Sergey On 08/10/14 18:30, Daniel Kulp wrote: This is a vote to release CXF 2.7.13 and 3.0.2.There are over 90 JIRA issues resolved for 3.0.2 which is a lot. Tags: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cxf.git;a=tag;h=3ec631c97e9eccf62490b176aab61044b3b9ab9f https://git-wip-

Re: [VOTE] CXF 2.7.13/3.0.2

2014-10-08 Thread Johan Edstrom
+1 non binding Johan Edstrom - via HopOn October 8, 2014 at 19:18 GMT, Jason Pell wrote:+1 (non binding)

Re: [VOTE] CXF 2.7.13/3.0.2

2014-10-08 Thread Jason Pell
+1 (non binding) On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 6:01 AM, Dennis Sosnoski wrote: > +1 > > - Dennis > > > On 10/09/2014 06:37 AM, Jeff Genender wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Jeff >> >> >> On Oct 8, 2014, at 11:30 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: >> >> This is a vote to release CXF 2.7.13 and 3.0.2.There are over 90

Re: [VOTE] CXF 2.7.13/3.0.2

2014-10-08 Thread Dennis Sosnoski
+1 - Dennis On 10/09/2014 06:37 AM, Jeff Genender wrote: +1 Jeff On Oct 8, 2014, at 11:30 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: This is a vote to release CXF 2.7.13 and 3.0.2.There are over 90 JIRA issues resolved for 3.0.2 which is a lot. Tags: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cxf.git;

Re: [VOTE] CXF 2.7.13/3.0.2

2014-10-08 Thread Jeff Genender
+1 Jeff On Oct 8, 2014, at 11:30 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > This is a vote to release CXF 2.7.13 and 3.0.2.There are over 90 JIRA > issues resolved for 3.0.2 which is a lot. > > Tags: > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cxf.git;a=tag;h=3ec631c97e9eccf62490b176aab61044b3b9ab9f >