Hi all,
I finally cut the third release of the iPOJO framework.
It's a two-step release. To avoid releasing too much artifacts at the
same time, I call a vote only for the core of the iPOJO framework (so
7 artifacts).
(external handlers and composite) will be release after those ones).
The
Clement,
Where are your KEYS? I didn't see them. Shouldn't they just be in the
KEYS file in the root of our SVN repo?
-> richard
Clement Escoffier wrote:
Hi all,
I finally cut the third release of the iPOJO framework.
It's a two-step release. To avoid releasing too much artifacts at the
sa
Hi,
The KEYS file is here : http://www.apache.org/dist/felix/KEYS
Do we need to add it at the root of the repository? The release
management guide just say to append it to /x1/www/www.apache.org/dist/felix/KEYS
.
Clement
On 20.01.2009, at 21:01, Richard S. Hall wrote:
Clement,
Where are
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 8:22 AM, Clement Escoffier
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The KEYS file is here : http://www.apache.org/dist/felix/KEYS
>
> Do we need to add it at the root of the repository? The release management
> guide just say to append it to /x1/www/www.apache.org/dist/felix/KEYS.
I think it is r
That explains it. I thought you had added your keys somewhere, but I
couldn't find them. Probably makes sense to put them in both
places...and to modify future vote messages to correctly indicate where
they are. :-)
Thanks.
-> richard
Clement Escoffier wrote:
Hi,
The KEYS file is here : ht
+1
Whew! One down clement, two more to go...
I think we need to investigate if there is a simpler way to release
iPOJO in the future. It is a lot of work for both Clement to create the
release and for us to verify it. Clearly, the current process is not
geared toward highly modular systems wi
Hi,
I just added my key at the root of the repository. Moreover, I fix
some issue in signature file. The signatures were correct, but the
beautification mess up some files (repeat the name several times). I
had an issue in my beautification script.
Clement
On 21.01.2009, at 10:50, Niclas
2009/1/24 Richard S. Hall
> +1
>
> Whew! One down clement, two more to go...
>
I'll try to finish checking it this weekend, haven't had time to go through
it all
I think we need to investigate if there is a simpler way to release iPOJO in
> the future. It is a lot of work for both Clement to cr
2009/1/20 Clement Escoffier
> Hi all,
>
> I finally cut the third release of the iPOJO framework.
> It's a two-step release. To avoid releasing too much artifacts at the same
> time, I call a vote only for the core of the iPOJO framework (so 7
> artifacts).
> (external handlers and composite) wil
+1
regards,
Karl
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 6:02 PM, Clement Escoffier
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I finally cut the third release of the iPOJO framework.
> It's a two-step release. To avoid releasing too much artifacts at the same
> time, I call a vote only for the core of the iPOJO framework (so 7
> ar
Oups, I forget mine,
+1,
Clement
On 25.01.2009, at 17:59, Karl Pauls wrote:
+1
regards,
Karl
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 6:02 PM, Clement Escoffier
wrote:
Hi all,
I finally cut the third release of the iPOJO framework.
It's a two-step release. To avoid releasing too much artifacts at
Hi all,
As we're in the release/voting season, I cut the second step of the
iPOJO framework release (composite + external handlers). Six artifacts
compose this second step.
The RCs are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~clement/releases/org/apache/felix/org.apache.felix.ipojo.composi
2009/1/30 Clement Escoffier
> Hi all,
>
> As we're in the release/voting season, I cut the second step of the iPOJO
> framework release (composite + external handlers). Six artifacts compose
> this second step.
>
> The RCs are available here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~clement/releases/org/apa
+1
Just a question: Is there a license attributed with the ga.js files ? if
so, we should make sure, that it is properly listed in the NOTICE file.
Regards
Felix
Clement Escoffier schrieb:
> Hi all,
>
> As we're in the release/voting season, I cut the second step of the
> iPOJO framework releas
2009/1/31 Felix Meschberger
> +1
>
> Just a question: Is there a license attributed with the ga.js files ? if
> so, we should make sure, that it is properly listed in the NOTICE file.
>
afaik those are from the online docs on the website - if you do a "save page
as... complete" from firefox then
Hi
Sent from my iPhone
On 30.01.2009, at 17:13, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
2009/1/31 Felix Meschberger
+1
Just a question: Is there a license attributed with the ga.js
files ? if
so, we should make sure, that it is properly listed in the NOTICE
file.
afaik those are from the online d
+1
Regarding the ga.js I'd say its generated and wouldn't add it to the notice.
regards,
Karl
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 7:41 PM, Clement Escoffier
wrote:
> Hi
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 30.01.2009, at 17:13, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
>
>> 2009/1/31 Felix Meschberger
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> Just a
+1
Sorry it took me so long.
-> richard
Clement Escoffier wrote:
Hi all,
As we're in the release/voting season, I cut the second step of the
iPOJO framework release (composite + external handlers). Six artifacts
compose this second step.
The RCs are available here:
http://people.apache.or
It’s time to finally close the vote on the iPOJO 1.2.0 release (second
step).
* +1 votes from Karl Pauls, Stuart McCulloch, Richard S. Hall, and
Felix Meschberger.
* No other votes
The vote is successful. I will make the release artifacts available as
soon as possible.
Thanks,
Regards
19 matches
Mail list logo