Mike,
I see what you mean, I've added a TODO for me in the Class emitter
(where all the members are gathered ;-))
EdB
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Michael Schmalle
wrote:
>
> Quoting Avi Kessner :
>
>> Uneducated question here.
>> If we can't read what is spit out, how can make tests to m
Quoting Avi Kessner :
Uneducated question here.
If we can't read what is spit out, how can make tests to make sure that the
gestalt is correct?
Erik didn't mean we can't read, when emitting all String data is
pushed into a Writer buffer.
If we can read what is spit out, why not read it a
Uneducated question here.
If we can't read what is spit out, how can make tests to make sure that the
gestalt is correct?
If we can read what is spit out, why not read it and remain stateless?
I'm assuming that as time goes on, we'll want to read the output to
optimize it on some level.
brought t
I knew I looked at what you did before.
I see no problem with that Erik, if you test visitAcessor() and it
does what you want and in the context of the method which is to test
the production of a unit where the unit here is a field and
Object.defineProperty() so that is good.
Does my thin
Hey,
I have to admit, after this last week, I am not on my game. My kids
finally decided to share what seems to be the flu, although I feel
like I am in limbo with really getting sick, so my head and focus is
being affected. :)
I need to look at what you have done. But, there is a philoso
Hi,
I'm aware we're trying to keep a state-less thing going with FJx, but
I ran into an issue that I'm not sure how to solve without adding some
kind of storage (private variable) on the 'goog' emitter.
The thing is that a property has/can have both a getter and a setter
accessor. For a full 'goo
