Re: Duplicate copyright date

2005-06-02 Thread Ross Gardler
Addi wrote: Thanks for finding that for me. I agree that the only difference should be the vendor hyperlinked or not and the year always there. I found where you are and I commented out line 301 to do it this way instead. I hadn't ever ventured into these files so it took me a while to figur

Re: Duplicate copyright date

2005-06-02 Thread Addi
link it prints it out both explicitly before the choose and again inside the "otherwise". A quick fix is to just comment out line 289. I think this should be an issue though. --tim On 6/2/05, Addi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm using 0.7 svn and when creating a new si

Re: Duplicate copyright date

2005-06-02 Thread Tim Williams
nk > this should be an issue though. > --tim > > > On 6/2/05, Addi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm using 0.7 svn and when creating a new site I am getting a duplicate > > copyright date ( Copyright (c) 2005 2005 The Acme Software Foundation.) > > p

Re: Duplicate copyright date

2005-06-02 Thread Tim Williams
t; wrote: > I'm using 0.7 svn and when creating a new site I am getting a duplicate > copyright date ( Copyright (c) 2005 2005 The Acme Software Foundation.) > prior to making any edits to anything. The year is only in the > skinconf.xml file once so it looks like it is gettin

Duplicate copyright date

2005-06-02 Thread Addi
I'm using 0.7 svn and when creating a new site I am getting a duplicate copyright date ( Copyright © 2005 2005 The Acme Software Foundation.) prior to making any edits to anything. The year is only in the skinconf.xml file once so it looks like it is getting duplicated somewhere in proce