Re: Plugin dependencies (Re: view/viewHelper: contract placement)

2005-04-25 Thread Thorsten Scherler
On Mon, 2005-04-25 at 11:24 +0100, Ross Gardler wrote: > Thorsten Scherler wrote: > > > On Sat, 2005-04-23 at 11:38 +0100, Ross Gardler wrote: > > > >>Thorsten Scherler wrote: > >> > >>... > >> > >> > >>>We have to start a howTo about the forrest dispatcher view > >>>implementation > >>> (view/vi

Re: Plugin dependencies (Re: view/viewHelper: contract placement)

2005-04-25 Thread Ross Gardler
Thorsten Scherler wrote: On Sat, 2005-04-23 at 11:38 +0100, Ross Gardler wrote: Thorsten Scherler wrote: ... We have to start a howTo about the forrest dispatcher view implementation (view/viewHelper plugins) because now we have docu in both plugins but to start with views you need *both* plugins

Re: Plugin dependencies (Re: view/viewHelper: contract placement)

2005-04-24 Thread Thorsten Scherler
Cheers for starting this, Ross. I was up to do it. :) On Sat, 2005-04-23 at 11:38 +0100, Ross Gardler wrote: > Thorsten Scherler wrote: > > ... > > > We have to start a howTo about the forrest dispatcher view > > implementation > > (view/viewHelper plugins) because now we have docu in both plug

Re: view/viewHelper: contract placement

2005-04-23 Thread Ross Gardler
Ross Gardler wrote: Juan Jose Pablos wrote: Thorsten Scherler wrote: HEADSUP: the links are not working of the *old* mails, because we moved the plugins into the whiteboard. You have to manually change the url to the plugin from old mails. Hi Diwaker (can you set reply-to to this list or unset it,

Plugin dependencies (Re: view/viewHelper: contract placement)

2005-04-23 Thread Ross Gardler
Thorsten Scherler wrote: ... We have to start a howTo about the forrest dispatcher view implementation (view/viewHelper plugins) because now we have docu in both plugins but to start with views you need *both* plugins installed. Then this is a plugin dependency. There should be no plugin depende

Re: view/viewHelper: contract placement

2005-04-23 Thread Ross Gardler
Juan Jose Pablos wrote: Thorsten Scherler wrote: HEADSUP: the links are not working of the *old* mails, because we moved the plugins into the whiteboard. You have to manually change the url to the plugin from old mails. Hi Diwaker (can you set reply-to to this list or unset it, thanks), hi list, Ma

Re: view/viewHelper: contract placement

2005-04-23 Thread Juan Jose Pablos
Thorsten Scherler wrote: HEADSUP: the links are not working of the *old* mails, because we moved the plugins into the whiteboard. You have to manually change the url to the plugin from old mails. Hi Diwaker (can you set reply-to to this list or unset it, thanks), hi list, Maybe we should put it bac

Re: view/viewHelper: contract placement

2005-04-23 Thread Thorsten Scherler
HEADSUP: the links are not working of the *old* mails, because we moved the plugins into the whiteboard. You have to manually change the url to the plugin from old mails. Hi Diwaker (can you set reply-to to this list or unset it, thanks), hi list, On Fri, 2005-04-22 at 16:03 -0700, Diwaker Gupta

view/viewHelper: contract placement

2005-04-22 Thread Diwaker Gupta
Hi everyone, Views allow us to define the order in which contracts appear, and also to group them using forrest:hooks. However, I didn't quite understand how view/viewHelper decides whether a contract goes into the section or the section of the final XHTML? From what I could understand from the