Re: [DISCUSS] Adding Google Analytics to our website

If we could add page analytics on docs and other pages that would awesome. That would allow us to create focused content blogs, videos, investment on those pages where we find the hottest views. Charlie On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 2:08 PM Bob Glithero wrote: > Hi All, > > Hopefully it's ok for me

Website refresh (was Re: [DISCUSS] Adding Google Analytics to our website)

Bob, I think a refresh of the Geode website is a great idea. I look forward to hearing more of your ideas. I’ve included a link below [1] to provide context on ASF policies around websites. Thanks, Anthony [1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs#introduction

Re: Proposal to bring GEODE-7969 to support/1.12

There appears to be consensus to bring this critical fix to support/1.12 https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/4926 has been merged to support/1.12 and Jira updated with correct fix versions. > On Apr 8, 2020, at 1:41 PM, Dick Cavender wrote: > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Adding Google Analytics to our website

Hi All, Hopefully it's ok for me to add my $.02 here. While understanding where the traffic is coming from is always helpful, it's possible to take a more active approach to driving traffic. I also help with community marketing at RabbitMQ (rabbitmq.com), which uses their platform to host

Re: [DISCUSS] Adding Google Analytics to our website

Hi Michael, A few things I'd like to know and potential associated actions: * Where do our visitors come from (referrer)? -> We might be able to lean in to those sources. * Are we getting any traffic from our Twitter presence? -> If certain tweets bring more traffic, let's do more of tweets like

Re: Proposal to bring GEODE-7969 to support/1.12

+1 On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 10:08 AM Joris Melchior wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 12:21 PM Owen Nichols wrote: > > > Recently it’s been noticed that netty-all-4.1.42.Final.jar is getting > > flagged for “high" security vulnerability CVE-2019-20444 and > CVE-2019-20445. > > > > Analysis

Review for PR #4815

Hi all, please could someone review PR #4815. Jira ticket https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-7838 Thanks and BR, Mario

Re: Proposal to bring GEODE-7969 to support/1.12

+1 On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 12:21 PM Owen Nichols wrote: > Recently it’s been noticed that netty-all-4.1.42.Final.jar is getting > flagged for “high" security vulnerability CVE-2019-20444 and CVE-2019-20445. > > Analysis shows that Geode does not use Netty in a manner that would expose > this

Re: About "change loglevel" command

This behavior has always worked like this since the internal implementation of logging changed from GemFire LogWriters to using Log4j. The reason is for performance. Geode is optimized for log level INFO with no filters -- it does this by wrapping all Log4j Loggers in a class called FastLogger

Re: Proposal to bring GEODE-7969 to support/1.12

+1 On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 at 17:21, Owen Nichols wrote: > Recently it’s been noticed that netty-all-4.1.42.Final.jar is getting > flagged for “high" security vulnerability CVE-2019-20444 and CVE-2019-20445. > > Analysis shows that Geode does not use Netty in a manner that would expose > this

Proposal to bring GEODE-7969 to support/1.12

Recently it’s been noticed that netty-all-4.1.42.Final.jar is getting flagged for “high" security vulnerability CVE-2019-20444 and CVE-2019-20445. Analysis shows that Geode does not use Netty in a manner that would expose this vulnerability. The risk of bringing GEODE-7969 is very low. Netty

Re: [DISCUSS] Adding Google Analytics to our website

What things are we looking to learn? Without knowing what we are interested in learning I would be hesitant to add anything. If we know what we want to learn then a conversation about analytics would be more fruitful (to me at least) -michael On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 3:31 PM Alexander Murmann

RE: About "change loglevel" command

Thanks Kirk. Could I ask what was the reason behind this change? In older Geode version (1.10 I think) we were using our own log4j files, and the command was working fine. Digging into the code I saw that its possible to start servers with a system property