Geronimo Revision: 744326 built with tests included
See the full build-2100.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090213/build-2100.log
Download the binaries from
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090213
[INFO] BUILD
Geronimo Revision: 744308 built with tests included
See the full build-2000.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.0/20090213/build-2000.log
Download the binaries from
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.0/20090213
[INFO] BUILD
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
> On Feb 13, 2009, at 11:47 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
>
> Based on the positive feedback to my proposal I updated out wiki process
> document with the steps I proposed earlier. See
> http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-project-policies.html f
On Feb 13, 2009, at 3:46 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
Thanks for the quick response Kevan.
Kevan Miller wrote:
Hi Joe,
Good questions.
On Feb 13, 2009, at 3:13 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
I have a few practical questions:
1) Must all affected releases be released before we can announce?
IMO, no. But I thin
Thanks for the quick response Kevan.
Kevan Miller wrote:
Hi Joe,
Good questions.
On Feb 13, 2009, at 3:13 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
I have a few practical questions:
1) Must all affected releases be released before we can announce?
IMO, no. But I think users must have a reasonable upgrade path
Hi Joe,
Good questions.
On Feb 13, 2009, at 3:13 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
I have a few practical questions:
1) Must all affected releases be released before we can announce?
IMO, no. But I think users must have a reasonable upgrade path to
receive the fix. A 2.0.x user could be reasonably expec
Kevan Miller wrote:
On Feb 13, 2009, at 11:47 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
Based on the positive feedback to my proposal I updated out wiki
process document with the steps I proposed earlier. See
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-project-policies.html for
details.
Sorry, I thought that I'd
On Feb 13, 2009, at 11:47 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
Based on the positive feedback to my proposal I updated out wiki
process document with the steps I proposed earlier. See http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-project-policies.html
for details.
Sorry, I thought that I'd replied to this, al
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4162?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jarek Gawor updated GERONIMO-4162:
--
Issue Type: Improvement (was: Task)
> Using Eclipse XML tools in Apache Geronimo 2.1
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4212?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jarek Gawor updated GERONIMO-4212:
--
Issue Type: Improvement (was: Task)
> Upgrade Ant to 1.7.1 version
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1224?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jarek Gawor updated GERONIMO-1224:
--
Issue Type: Improvement (was: Wish)
> shutdown.bat / shutdown.sh and associated StopServer
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4037?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jarek Gawor resolved GERONIMO-4037.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Jarek Gawor
Committed another work-around for this probl
Based on the positive feedback to my proposal I updated out wiki process
document with the steps I proposed earlier. See
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-project-policies.html for details.
Joe
Donald Woods wrote:
Sounds good.
-Donald
Joe Bohn wrote:
Donald Woods wrote:
Sounds go
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GSHELL-159?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Guillaume Nodet closed GSHELL-159.
--
Resolution: Won't Fix
Sending
gshell-wisdom/gshell-wisdom-core/src/main/java/org/apache
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GSHELL-159?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Guillaume Nodet reopened GSHELL-159:
Needs more investigation
> NegativeArraySizeException is thrown when using just the Shell Impe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GSHELL-159?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12673271#action_12673271
]
Guillaume Nodet commented on GSHELL-159:
Should the IO class use
{code}
publi
Hrm, this should have been fixed by the gshell-terminal adapters...
and why that if () was removed.
--jason
On Feb 13, 2009, at 10:21 PM, gno...@apache.org wrote:
Author: gnodet
Date: Fri Feb 13 15:21:56 2009
New Revision: 744143
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=744143&view=rev
Log:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GSHELL-159?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Guillaume Nodet resolved GSHELL-159.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.0-alpha-2
Sending
gshell-wisdom/gshell-wi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GSHELL-159?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12673267#action_12673267
]
Jason Dillon commented on GSHELL-159:
-
This should have been fixed by the gshell-termin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GSHELL-159?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Guillaume Nodet reassigned GSHELL-159:
--
Assignee: Guillaume Nodet (was: Jason Dillon)
> NegativeArraySizeException is thrown w
k
--jason
On Feb 13, 2009, at 10:01 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I will commit a patch that is kinda blocking on windows. It's
minimal, but has been raised while i was doing the release. So I will
commit the patch and restart the release asap.
2009/2/13 Jason Dillon :
What happened?
--jaso
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GSHELL-159?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12673260#action_12673260
]
Edell Nolan commented on GSHELL-159:
I can consistently reproduce this on windows but i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GSHELL-159?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Edell Nolan updated GSHELL-159:
---
Attachment: gshell-159.patch
> NegativeArraySizeException is thrown when using just the Shell Impemen
NegativeArraySizeException is thrown when using just the Shell Impementation
when running tests.
Key: GSHELL-159
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GSHELL-159
I will commit a patch that is kinda blocking on windows. It's
minimal, but has been raised while i was doing the release. So I will
commit the patch and restart the release asap.
2009/2/13 Jason Dillon :
> What happened?
>
> --jason
>
>
> On Feb 13, 2009, at 9:26 PM, gno...@apache.org wrote:
>
>
What happened?
--jason
On Feb 13, 2009, at 9:26 PM, gno...@apache.org wrote:
Author: gnodet
Date: Fri Feb 13 14:26:06 2009
New Revision: 744122
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=744122&view=rev
Log:
Rollback release
Removed:
geronimo/gshell/tags/gshell-1.0-alpha-2/
Geronimo Revision: 744003 built with tests included
See the full build-0200.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.0/20090213/build-0200.log
Download the binaries from
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.0/20090213
[INFO] BUILD
27 matches
Mail list logo
