Hi,
It's not that important and likely doesn't require a separate vote,
but as I was told it was decided to disable the archive bot of
#geronimo. Therefore, I thought to send the email so that the matter
is solved once and for all and won't be missed in the flow of messages
in our mailboxes.
[ ]
2006/1/8, Jacek Laskowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> [X] +1 Yes, enable the bot - get the archive working again
> [ ] +/- 0 I don't care about it; do what you want
> [ ] -1 Don't turn it on; reasons included
Jacek
On 1/8/06, Jacek Laskowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's not that important and likely doesn't require a separate vote,
> but as I was told it was decided to disable the archive bot of
> #geronimo. Therefore, I thought to send the email so that the matter
> is solved once and for all and won't
+1
- sachin
On Jan 8, 2006, at 8:38 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
Hi,
It's not that important and likely doesn't require a separate vote,
but as I was told it was decided to disable the archive bot of
#geronimo. Therefore, I thought to send the email so that the matter
is solved once and for al
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jacek Laskowski wrote, On 1/8/2006 5:38 AM:
> Hi,
>
> It's not that important and likely doesn't require a separate vote,
> but as I was told it was decided to disable the archive bot of
> #geronimo. Therefore, I thought to send the email so that the
[X ] +1 Yes, enable the bot - get the archive working again
david jencks
On Jan 8, 2006, at 5:38 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
Hi,
It's not that important and likely doesn't require a separate vote,
but as I was told it was decided to disable the archive bot of
#geronimo. Therefore, I thought t
+1 Yes, enable the bot - get the archive working again
On 1/8/06, Jacek Laskowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It's not that important and likely doesn't require a separate vote,
> but as I was told it was decided to disable the archive bot of
> #geronimo. Therefore, I thought to send the
+1 Yes, enable the bot - get the archive working again
John
+1 enable the bot and Change the topic to tell people where to get the archives
from
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
Hi,
It's not that important and likely doesn't require a separate vote,
but as I was told it was decided to disable the archive bot of
#geronimo. Therefore, I thought to send the email s
+1
--jason
-Original Message-
From: Jacek Laskowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 14:38:01
To:dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] #geronimo archive - to enable or not to enable?
Hi,
It's not that important and likely doesn't require a separate vote,
b
+0
Sounds fine to me, won't die without it though :)
-David
On Jan 8, 2006, at 5:38 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
Hi,
It's not that important and likely doesn't require a separate vote,
but as I was told it was decided to disable the archive bot of
#geronimo. Therefore, I thought to send the em
+1
On 8 Jan 2006, at 13:38, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
Hi,
It's not that important and likely doesn't require a separate vote,
but as I was told it was decided to disable the archive bot of
#geronimo. Therefore, I thought to send the email so that the matter
is solved once and for all and won't be
On Jan 8, 2006, at 8:38 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
Hi,
It's not that important and likely doesn't require a separate vote,
but as I was told it was decided to disable the archive bot of
#geronimo. Therefore, I thought to send the email so that the matter
is solved once and for all and won't be
13 matches
Mail list logo