Please vote on this Apache hbase thirdparty release candidate,
hbase-thirdparty-4.1.1RC0
The VOTE will remain open for at least 72 hours.
[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache hbase thirdparty 4.1.1
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
The tag to be voted on is 4.1.1RC0:
https://git
See https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/4552
After modifying some code in HBase, mainly because of a behavior change in
jetty, we can pass all the UTs when depending on hbase-thirdparty-4.1.1.
张铎(Duo Zhang) 于2022年6月18日周六 23:04写道:
> Please vote on this Apache hbase thirdparty release candidate,
+1 (binding)
* Signature: ok
* Checksum : ok
* Rat check (1.8.0_301): ok
- mvn clean apache-rat:check
* Built from source (1.8.0_301): ok
- mvn clean install -DskipTests
张铎(Duo Zhang) 于2022年6月20日周一 23:40写道:
> See https://github.com/apache/hbase
+1 (binding)
* Signature: ok
* Checksum : ok
* Rat check (1.8.0_322): ok
- mvn clean apache-rat:check
* Built from source (1.8.0_322): ok
- mvn clean install -DskipTests
Thanks,
Peter
On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 7:59 AM Guanghao Zhang wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> * Signature: ok
>
+1 (binding)
* Signature: ok
* Checksum : ok
* Rat check (1.8.0_202): ok
- mvn clean apache-rat:check
* Built from source (1.8.0_202): ok
- mvn clean install -DskipTests
Thanks,
Xiaolin Ha
张铎(Duo Zhang) 于2022年6月18日周六 23:04写道:
> Please vote on this Apache hbase thirdparty release candid
+1 (binding)
1. Download the source tarball, signature (.asc), and checksum (.sha512):
OK
2. Import gpg keys: download KEYS and run gpg --import
/path/to/downloaded/KEYS : OK
3. Verify the signature by running: gpg --verify
hbase-thirdparty-4.1.1-src.tar.gz.asc : OK
4. Verify the checksum by r
+1 (binding)
Checked the diff between 4.1.0 and 4.1.1-rc0: *OK* (
https://github.com/apache/hbase-thirdparty/compare/rel/4.1.0...4.1.1RC0)
Checked release note and changes: *Minor Update Required*
- It seems we should also include HBASE-26893 (jackson updated to 2.13.3)
into release note (RELEASEN
Thanks Yu.
We do not write release note for HBASE-26893(my fault) so the generate
RELEASENOTES.md does not have the release note for this change.
I thought the title just tells everything so I did not add a release note
for it...
Anyway, not a blocker this time. In the future will rememer to alw
Thanks for the quick reply Duo, makes sense to me.
And thanks for driving this release.
Best Regards,
Yu
On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 at 23:17, 张铎(Duo Zhang) wrote:
> Thanks Yu.
>
> We do not write release note for HBASE-26893(my fault) so the generate
> RELEASENOTES.md does not have the release note
Here is my own +1.
Yu Li 于2022年6月21日周二 23:24写道:
> Thanks for the quick reply Duo, makes sense to me.
>
> And thanks for driving this release.
>
> Best Regards,
> Yu
>
>
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 at 23:17, 张铎(Duo Zhang) wrote:
>
> > Thanks Yu.
> >
> > We do not write release note for HBASE-26893(my
With 6 binding +1s and no -1, the vote passes.
Let me finish the release.
Thanks all for voting and helping!
张铎(Duo Zhang) 于2022年6月22日周三 10:16写道:
> Here is my own +1.
>
> Yu Li 于2022年6月21日周二 23:24写道:
>
>> Thanks for the quick reply Duo, makes sense to me.
>>
>> And thanks for driving this rel
Oh, forgot to change the title...
张铎(Duo Zhang) 于2022年6月22日周三 10:17写道:
> With 6 binding +1s and no -1, the vote passes.
>
> Let me finish the release.
>
> Thanks all for voting and helping!
>
> 张铎(Duo Zhang) 于2022年6月22日周三 10:16写道:
>
>> Here is my own +1.
>>
>> Yu Li 于2022年6月21日周二 23:24写道:
>>
>
12 matches
Mail list logo