Re: [jira] [Resolved] (HBASE-8591) Doc Improvement: Replication blog

2013-05-22 Thread Varun Sharma
Hi Himanshu, I have a follow up question on these metrics. I see that both these metrics basically diff against the timestamp of the WALEdit. The timestamp on the WALEdit is generated by the region server in source cluster. So if there is some clock skew (even 1 second) on the slave cluster, the a

Re: [jira] [Resolved] (HBASE-8591) Doc Improvement: Replication blog

2013-05-22 Thread Demai Ni
Himanshu, Thanks a lot. Your suggestion saved me a lot of time if have to figure it out myself Demai on the run On May 22, 2013, at 11:00 AM, Himanshu Vashishtha wrote: > Since the source metrics would not be available in case the master cluster > is down, > your best bet would be "sink.ageO

Re: [jira] [Resolved] (HBASE-8591) Doc Improvement: Replication blog

2013-05-22 Thread Himanshu Vashishtha
Since the source metrics would not be available in case the master cluster is down, your best bet would be "sink.ageOfLastAppliedOp" at the slave cluster. Its value is the timestamp of the last WALEdit that is applied to the slave. On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 10:02 AM, N Dm wrote: > Stack and Hima

Re: [jira] [Resolved] (HBASE-8591) Doc Improvement: Replication blog

2013-05-22 Thread N Dm
Stack and Himanshu, many thanks for putting this together. Particularly the info from Replication Metrics, whichs help a lot to understand the replication. A quick question on source.ageOfLastShippedOp. In the case that master cluster down, the user will like to know what the delta between mast

[jira] [Resolved] (HBASE-8591) Doc Improvement: Replication blog

2013-05-21 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8591?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack resolved HBASE-8591. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.98.0 Hadoop Flags: Reviewed Committed to trunk. Thanks Himanshu