Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
>
> To do this right we would have to test new code
> against MS IS of various versions and MS ISA of various versions.
I'd be perfectly fine with code that passes our old unit tests :-)
That's enough to claim that we didn't loose functionality. Whoever
has a problem is e
On Fri, 2007-12-21 at 18:50 +0100, Ortwin Glück wrote:
>
> Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
> > There is no way I am going to buy Microsoft software in order to test
> > our code for compatibility with NTLM. No wy.
>
> You can download a VM of Windows XP here:
>
> http://www.microsoft.com/down
Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
> My evil plan is to
> use HttpClient 3.1 as a binary dependency for httpclient-ntlm (or some
> such) module and simply use NTLM classes from our old client. Until
> someone donates an implementation based on JCIFS, that is. It will not
> be me, though.
That is more evil t
Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
> There is no way I am going to buy Microsoft software in order to test
> our code for compatibility with NTLM. No wy.
You can download a VM of Windows XP here:
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=21EABB90-958F-4B64-B5F1-73D0A413C8EF&displa
On Fri, 2007-12-21 at 18:36 +0100, Roland Weber wrote:
> Hi Oleg,
>
> no collissions with my todo list, except maybe this one:
>
> > (3) Do something about NTLM authentication support.
>
> I still have to dig into the details of hosting code with
> an LGPL dependency at Apache. I'm pretty sure
