Ranier wrote:
Hi,
Anyone knows about implementation of kqueue, dev/poll in apr, httpd?
Thanks.
Ranier
The apr_pollset API in APR would be a suitable wrapper for a kqueue or
dev/poll implementation, but no one has spent the time and effort to do
it yet. I have a prototype httpd implementatio
Hi,
Anyone knows about implementation of kqueue,
dev/poll in apr, httpd?
Thanks.
Ranier
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003, Nick Kew wrote:
> 1. mod_diagnostics
Well, the feedback seems to indicate interest in that.
Shall I take that as a cue to do a writeup?
(BTW, someone said mod_bucketeer, but I can't see any overlap)
> 2. mod_upload
> 3. mod_xml_gnome_xslt
OK, no interest - fair enough.
>
Hi,
Anyone knows about kqueue, dev/poll implementation in apr, httpd?
Thanks.
Ranier.
André Malo wrote:
It's somehow obvious, that I'm currently cleaning up the mod_rewrite code ;-)
Now I want to reorder the code in order to get a rid of most of the forward
declarations in mod_rewrite.h. In fact, I want to remove all the non-public
parts from the header file. (i.e. all, except the
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, André Malo wrote:
> parts from the header file. (i.e. all, except the ap_register_mapfunc stuff),
> so that other modules that include mod_rewrite.h (say, in order to register a
> map function) find a clean file.
>
> Are there any objections against?
PLEEEASSE do this if you'
It's somehow obvious, that I'm currently cleaning up the mod_rewrite code ;-)
Now I want to reorder the code in order to get a rid of most of the forward
declarations in mod_rewrite.h. In fact, I want to remove all the non-public
parts from the header file. (i.e. all, except the ap_register_mapfunc
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Can somebody enlight me what this code in mod_rewrite.c is good for?
>
> static int hook_fixup(request_rec *r)
> {
>[...]
> /* we shouldn't do anything in subrequests */
> if (r->main != NULL) {
> return DECLINED;
> }
>
> It took me days to tr
>> Did some of you have a binary for mod_ssl 2.0.47 Windows ?
> There is a 'over-complete' pre-built Apache 2.0.47 package
> including mod_ssl and OpenSSL 0.9.7b for Windows:
> http://www.apachefriends.org/wampp.html
> But be aware that it's fairly large, around 43MB. Didn't look
> into it; just
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, Mads Toftum wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 11:33:42AM -0400, Joshua Slive wrote:
> > If you could provide a long-term stable url, we could at least point to
> > this from the ProxyPassReverse docs. It certainly qualifies as a
> > frequently requested feature.
> >
> Or just
>> > $prefix/build sounds more naturally to me.
>>
>> +1.
>>
> +1
> -Thom
+1
Kess
On 25/07/2003, at 06:07, Henri Gomez wrote:
Hi to all,
Did some of you have a binary for mod_ssl 2.0.47 Windows ?
There is a 'over-complete' pre-built Apache 2.0.47 package
including mod_ssl and OpenSSL 0.9.7b for Windows:
http://www.apachefriends.org/wampp.html
But be aware that it's fairly lar
Hi to all,
Did some of you have a binary for mod_ssl 2.0.47 Windows ?
Regards
On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 11:33:42AM -0400, Joshua Slive wrote:
> If you could provide a long-term stable url, we could at least point to
> this from the ProxyPassReverse docs. It certainly qualifies as a
> frequently requested feature.
>
Or just use http://modules.apache.org/search.php?id=625
vh
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 10:17:25PM +0100, Nick Kew wrote:
> 1. mod_diagnostics
I'd very much like to see this included.
(http://access.www.webthing.com/software/mod_diagnostics.c)
> 3. mod_xml_gnome_xslt
>
link?
> 4. mod_proxy_html (NEW!)
While this is _very_ useful for reverse proxying, I do
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003, Nick Kew wrote:
> 4. mod_proxy_html (NEW!)
> Apache as a reverse-proxy has hitherto been incomplete, as it falls
> down when HTML links in proxied pages fail outside the proxy.
> mod_proxy_html is an output filter to rewrite HTML links where
> necessary into the proxy's addres
* Sander Striker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> > From: André Malo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 11:38 PM
>
> > * Aaron Bannert wrote:
> >
> > > On Thursday, July 24, 2003, at 01:31 PM, Astrid Keßler wrote:
> > >
> > >>> It would be a big help to our users if config.n
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 18:49:07 +1000 (EST), I wrote:
> -rsub = subrecfunc(r->filename, r); \
> +rsub = subrecfunc("", r); \
[..]
> I gues
Oops..
I guess that should be okay for the lookahead, right? I suppose it doesn't
matter when r->filename is absolute, but I think it
Please consider my suggestion:
--- mod_rewrite.c.old Fri Jul 25 18:07:38 2003
+++ mod_rewrite.c Fri Jul 25 18:12:42 2003
@@ -3823,7 +3823,7 @@
/* ...and sub and main paths differ */ \
&& strcmp(r->main->uri, r->uri) != 0))) { \
> From: André Malo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 11:38 PM
> * Aaron Bannert wrote:
>
> > On Thursday, July 24, 2003, at 01:31 PM, Astrid Keßler wrote:
> >
> >>> It would be a big help to our users if config.nice was installed by a
> >>> make
> >>> install.
> >>
> >> Th
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 01:57:26PM -0700, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> Where should it be installed? $prefix/lib maybe?
>
How about $prefix/conf?
vh
Mads Toftum
--
`Darn it, who spiked my coffee with water?!' - lwall
21 matches
Mail list logo
