so there was this pickup truck maker, and he sold a bunch of pickup
trucks to people far and wide
but some of those people just wanted the truck for the chassis, so they
replaced the truck bed with a camper they bought from someone else
many of these camper customers found out that when you tur
Glenn wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 02:05:39PM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Glenn wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 11:49:03AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
a.k.a. "What should the apxs 2.0 require statement say?"
I'm not sure when
my $cntopen = () = ($before =~ m|^\s*<[^/].*$|mg);
starts working
Günter Knauf wrote:
Hi,
Patch below was tested and it worked in a linux environment.
# diff -u mod_info.old.c mod_info.c
--- mod_info.old.c Mon Sep 15 07:48:59 2003
+++ mod_info.c Mon Sep 15 07:50:18 2003
@@ -405,7 +405,7 @@
ap_rprintf(r, "Server Root: "
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 02:05:39PM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> Glenn wrote:
> >On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 11:49:03AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> >
> >>a.k.a. "What should the apxs 2.0 require statement say?"
>
>
> +
> /+\
> +
>
Hi,
> Patch below was tested and it worked in a linux environment.
> # diff -u mod_info.old.c mod_info.c
> --- mod_info.old.c Mon Sep 15 07:48:59 2003
> +++ mod_info.c Mon Sep 15 07:50:18 2003
> @@ -405,7 +405,7 @@
> ap_rprintf(r, "Server Root: "
> "%s\n
Glenn wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 11:49:03AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
a.k.a. "What should the apxs 2.0 require statement say?"
+
/+\
+
+
+
apxs fails to build a module, giving this error
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 11:49:03AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> a.k.a. "What should the apxs 2.0 require statement say?"
>
> apxs says "require 5.003;"
>
> on an old Sun box with this installation:
>
> $ which perl
> /opt/LWperl/bin/perl
> $ perl -version
>
> This is perl, version 5.003 with EM
At 10:30 AM 10/19/2003, Joshua Slive wrote:
>On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>> http://cvs.apache.org/ shows that we have a *lot* of repositories that are hard for
>> newcomers to sort through (and consume quite a bit of space) - if we httpd'ers can
>> help mop up - I'm sure our e
a.k.a. "What should the apxs 2.0 require statement say?"
apxs says "require 5.003;"
on an old Sun box with this installation:
$ which perl
/opt/LWperl/bin/perl
$ perl -version
This is perl, version 5.003 with EMBED
built under solaris at Mar 12 1997 03:06:34
+ suidperl security p
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Be careful
you have configuration to avoid buffering the entire .iso file that
somebody tries to copy to their DAV filesystem. And your configuration
may be roll-your-own w.r.t. selecting which request objects to operate
on since you may have to make your decisions be
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> http://cvs.apache.org/ shows that we have a *lot* of repositories that are hard for
> newcomers to sort through (and consume quite a bit of space) - if we httpd'ers can
> help mop up - I'm sure our efforts are appreciated.
For that reason, and ju
On 19/09/2003, at 08:45, André Malo wrote:
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2617.txt";>RFC
2617
- (Draft standard)
+ (Standards Track)
IETF standards track:
Internet Draft < Proposed Standard < Draft Standard < Standard
2617 is a Draft Standar
> Aryeh Katz wrote:
>
> > In mod_info, SERVER_CONFIG_FILE is used in order to determine which
> > config file the apache server is running with However, this ignores
> > the -f option. Shouldn't we be printing out ap_conftree->filename?
>
> that sounds right to me... got a patch you have tested
> Be careful
> you have configuration to avoid buffering the entire .iso file that
> somebody tries to copy to their DAV filesystem. And your configuration
> may be roll-your-own w.r.t. selecting which request objects to operate
> on since you may have to make your decisions before Apache has
Aryeh Katz wrote:
In mod_info, SERVER_CONFIG_FILE is used in order to determine which
config file the apache server is running with
However, this ignores the -f option.
Shouldn't we be printing out
ap_conftree->filename?
that sounds right to me... got a patch you have tested that I can play
wit
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only way I can see where I will have the ability
to insert those HTTP inbound request headers is if
my filter runs between the CORE_IN and the HTTP_IN
input filter,
I'm afraid this is true... Does anyone else have a better idea?
in which case I will need a properly
p
16 matches
Mail list logo
