patch request

2008-06-04 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
* mod_proxy_http, mod_proxy_ajp, mod_proxy_balancer: Make modules nocanon aware and do not add the query string again in this case. PR 44803 Given the complexity of this proposal, a rollup patch would be helpful.

Re: Endless loop in split_on_bdry() of library/parser_multipart.c?

2008-06-04 Thread Bojan Smojver
On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 21:35 -0700, Joe Schaefer wrote: > Needs a comment in the source about why we're using > volatile here, but otherwise +1. Ah, yes... Sorry. I also need to fix up the comment in the CHANGES file. -- Bojan

Re: SNI in 2.2.9? (Re: 2.2.9 status)

2008-06-04 Thread Kaspar Brand
Joe Orton wrote: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=662815&view=rev > > Changing the dirconf structure fields in-place seems ugly and may even > be thread-unsafe (not sure). Thanks for pointing this out, I wasn't aware of the danger of doing so. The same effect can be achieved with the attached,

Re: SNI in 2.2.9? (Re: 2.2.9 status)

2008-06-04 Thread Paul Querna
Oden Eriksson wrote: Den Wednesday 04 June 2008 14:06:22 skrev Ian G: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: SNI in 2.2.9? (Re: 2.2.9 status) 61495 by: Kaspar Brand FYI. SNI is in Mandriva Linux 2008.1. Then you should pull it out ASAP, as noted by others the patch currently in trunk is broken

Re: SNI in 2.2.9? (Re: 2.2.9 status)

2008-06-04 Thread Oden Eriksson
Den Wednesday 04 June 2008 14:06:22 skrev Ian G: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > SNI in 2.2.9? (Re: 2.2.9 status) > > 61495 by: Kaspar Brand FYI. SNI is in Mandriva Linux 2008.1. -- Regards // Oden Eriksson

Re: SNI in 2.2.9? (Re: 2.2.9 status)

2008-06-04 Thread Joe Orton
On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 04:42:07PM +0200, Kaspar Brand wrote: > So, is there still hope for SNI being added in 2.2.9...? Let me know if > there's anything else I can do to increase the chances of getting this > proposal accepted. http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=662815&view=rev Changing the dirco

Re: SNI in 2.2.9? (Re: 2.2.9 status)

2008-06-04 Thread Ian G
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: SNI in 2.2.9? (Re: 2.2.9 status) 61495 by: Kaspar Brand There are just a handful of useful patches in STATUS lacking a single vote for inclusion in 2.2.9... While not completely true for the SNI backport proposal (requires more than a single additional vote)

Re: mod_rewrite query !

2008-06-04 Thread Eric Covener
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 6:20 AM, Agnello George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > hi > i am trying to get mod_rewrite working for my apache server This list is for development discussion. Please use the users list: http://httpd.apache.org/lists.html#http-users -- Eric Covener [EMAIL PROTECTED]

mod_rewrite query !

2008-06-04 Thread Agnello George
hi i am trying to get mod_rewrite working for my apache server ( apache 2.2.8 ). my virtual host files ( vhost.conf ) looks something like this : ## NameVirtualHost *:80 ServerAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED] ServerName agnello.sy

Seems to be apache hanging, any idea on this

2008-06-04 Thread Arnab Ganguly
Hi All, I am using Apache 2.2 Worker in Red-Hat 3.0. Following are the behaviors observed in my access logs. 1) Sometime for a particular second there is no entry in the access log although the server was up and it was fed by HTTP request. 2) Time stamp in the access log entry sometimes come in ir