Re: [PATCH] -DNO_DETACH and/or apr_proc_detach() confusion?

2002-04-01 Thread Aaron Bannert
On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 08:20:24PM -0800, Jos Backus wrote: > On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 09:07:28PM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote: > > I'll forget about it for now (but I will commit a cleanup of > > apr_proc_detach() which won't change the semantics). For the long > > term I guess I want -DFOREGROUND a

Re: [PATCH] -DNO_DETACH and/or apr_proc_detach() confusion?

2002-04-01 Thread Aaron Bannert
On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 09:07:28PM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote: > it isn't called in the parent... that's why I wanted to use > -DNO_DETACH :) by "parent" I meant "apache parent", not just "that process that forked other processes". > note that -DNO_DETACH from gdb is doomed... setsid() will fail

Re: [PATCH] -DNO_DETACH and/or apr_proc_detach() confusion?

2002-04-01 Thread Jos Backus
On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 09:07:28PM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote: > I'll forget about it for now (but I will commit a cleanup of > apr_proc_detach() which won't change the semantics). For the long > term I guess I want -DFOREGROUND and appropriate support in > apr_proc_detach(). Please, please don't

Re: [PATCH] -DNO_DETACH and/or apr_proc_detach() confusion?

2002-04-01 Thread Jeff Trawick
Aaron Bannert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 05:23:07PM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote: > > as far as error reporting: > > > > the error is written to the log, not to stderr, so you don't see it > > Can we correct this so there is immediate response on stderr? > > > as far

Re: [PATCH] -DNO_DETACH and/or apr_proc_detach() confusion?

2002-04-01 Thread Aaron Bannert
On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 05:23:07PM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote: > as far as error reporting: > > the error is written to the log, not to stderr, so you don't see it Can we correct this so there is immediate response on stderr? > as far as what I want to do: > > I just want to run httpd in th

Re: [PATCH] -DNO_DETACH and/or apr_proc_detach() confusion?

2002-04-01 Thread Jeff Trawick
Aaron Bannert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 04:53:29PM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote: > > This gets -DNO_DETACH working for me with Apache's prefork MPM on > > Linux and FreeBSD. But from Aaron's commit log for revision > > 1.34 I gather that this will break daemontools-like

Re: [PATCH] -DNO_DETACH and/or apr_proc_detach() confusion?

2002-04-01 Thread Aaron Bannert
On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 04:53:29PM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote: > This gets -DNO_DETACH working for me with Apache's prefork MPM on > Linux and FreeBSD. But from Aaron's commit log for revision > 1.34 I gather that this will break daemontools-like programs. > > How should I get "./httpd -DNO_DETAC

[PATCH] -DNO_DETACH and/or apr_proc_detach() confusion?

2002-04-01 Thread Jeff Trawick
This gets -DNO_DETACH working for me with Apache's prefork MPM on Linux and FreeBSD. But from Aaron's commit log for revision 1.34 I gather that this will break daemontools-like programs. How should I get "./httpd -DNO_DETACH" to work? Calling setsid() is bogus. This patch avoids the setsid()