On 14.08.2012 23:20, Jim Jagielski wrote:
slotmem handles this well, afaict ;)
The fix applied in r1373270 which Joe also had a look at is very similar
to the handling in slotmem. I added some macros as proposed by Joe.
Fortunately the code in shmcb already did all the address calculations
u
slotmem handles this well, afaict ;)
On Aug 13, 2012, at 12:32 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> PR 53040 reveals, that mod_socache_shmcb has an alignment problem. One of
>> the three structs mapped into shm contains an apr_time_t membe
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 10:19:47PM +0200, Rainer Jung wrote:
> I went the "choose right alignment" way now:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~rjung/patches/mod_socache_shmcb-alignment.patch
>
> It actually wasn't that complicated.
Alignment problems never die with that code!
+1, that looks good, mi
On 13.08.2012 21:02, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 13.08.2012 19:40, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Rainer Jung
wrote:
On 13.08.2012 18:32, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Rainer Jung
wrote:
Hi,
PR 53040 reveals, that mod_socache_shmcb has an alignment
On 13.08.2012 19:40, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 13.08.2012 18:32, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Rainer Jung
wrote:
Hi,
PR 53040 reveals, that mod_socache_shmcb has an alignment problem. One of
the three structs mapped
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 13.08.2012 18:32, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Rainer Jung
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> PR 53040 reveals, that mod_socache_shmcb has an alignment problem. One of
>>> the three structs mapped into shm contains
On 13.08.2012 18:32, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi,
PR 53040 reveals, that mod_socache_shmcb has an alignment problem. One of
the three structs mapped into shm contains an apr_time_t member, which at
least on Sparc is 8 Bytes, whereas for 32 bit bu
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> Hi,
>
> PR 53040 reveals, that mod_socache_shmcb has an alignment problem. One of
> the three structs mapped into shm contains an apr_time_t member, which at
> least on Sparc is 8 Bytes, whereas for 32 bit builds long is only 4 Bytes.
>
> Curr
Hi,
PR 53040 reveals, that mod_socache_shmcb has an alignment problem. One
of the three structs mapped into shm contains an apr_time_t member,
which at least on Sparc is 8 Bytes, whereas for 32 bit builds long is
only 4 Bytes.
Currently everything is aligned for 4 Bytes, so we get bus
error
