> On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 07:30:51PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> > > +qi = apr_palloc(pool, sizeof(*qi));
> > > +memset(qi, 0, sizeof(*qi));
> >
> > As we said, if you are concerned about the performance aspect
> > of apr_pcalloc, then we should fix apr_pcalloc NOT attempt to
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 07:39:24PM -0700, Brian Pane wrote:
> I was going to complain about the addition of yet another mutex
> to the critical path of request processing, but it got me thinking
> about an approach to making worker faster: shorten the time spent
> in the mutex-protected region.
Y
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 07:30:51PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> > +qi = apr_palloc(pool, sizeof(*qi));
> > +memset(qi, 0, sizeof(*qi));
>
> As we said, if you are concerned about the performance aspect
> of apr_pcalloc, then we should fix apr_pcalloc NOT attempt to
> work around
Comments inline.
On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 01:45:00AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 1.16 +108 -0httpd-2.0/server/mpm/worker/fdqueue.c
>
> Index: fdqueue.c
> ===
> RCS file: /home/cvs/httpd-2.0/server/mpm/worker/
