We're upgrading from 2.0.44 to 2.0.46 and have noticed that the httpd
binary now seems to need libgcc_s.
# ldd /some/path/httpd
libaprutil-0.so.0 => /some/path/lib/libaprutil-0.so.0
libexpat.so.0 => /some/path/lib/libexpat.so.0
libapr-0.so.0 => /some/pat
Build it with CFLAGS=-static-libgcc
On Thu, 2003-06-05 at 05:18, harald deppeler wrote:
> We're upgrading from 2.0.44 to 2.0.46 and have noticed that the httpd
> binary now seems to need libgcc_s.
>
> # ldd /some/path/httpd
> libaprutil-0.so.0 => /some/path/lib/libaprutil-0.so.0
>
harald deppeler wrote:
We're upgrading from 2.0.44 to 2.0.46 and have noticed that the httpd
binary now seems to need libgcc_s.
ugh
see also http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20447
# ldd /some/path/httpd
libgcc_s.so.1 => (file not found)
libgcc_s.so.1 =>
Brian Akins wrote:
Build it with CFLAGS=-static-libgcc
that's potentially very nice
But does that have the old problem when httpd doesn't reference anything
in libgcc.a but mod_foo.so does, and then mod_foo.so fails to load
because it needs __floatdisf or something like that?
We get PRs for stu
Ok, I tried the CFLAGS=-static-libgcc trick, it didn't work for me.
Interpreting the compile log I gather that the c flag is carried through
from the configure stage up until to the final linking, however, it does
not achieve the desired result (see excerpt at the end of this mail). This
would pro
harald deppeler wrote:
Still bugs me that other packages (BIND, Sendmail, ... ) we build on that
machine don't seem to reference libgcc_s ... and the 2.0.44 Apache did
not, either. I'll check whether we were really using the same version
of gcc for packaging 2.0.44.
I recall people with the same fe
On Thu, 5 Jun 2003, harald deppeler wrote:
> Ok, I tried the CFLAGS=-static-libgcc trick, it didn't work for me.
Did you verify that libtool passed the flag to the linker?
You can achieve that by removing --silent from the respective
Makefile.
- Sascha
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 04:43:36AM +0200, Sascha Schumann wrote:
> Did you verify that libtool passed the flag to the linker?
> You can achieve that by removing --silent from the respective
> Makefile.
I believe the flag is passed to the linker. I adapted build/config_vars.mk
# diff bu
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 04:01:27PM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> seems like you could copy libgcc_s to Apache's lib directory... Apache's
> bin/envvars file already updates LD_LIBRARY_PATH to include that directory
This works just fine. Allows us to make a self-contained Apache
package. The admi
