I, on the other hand, would be very interested in the strong consistency option.
(Very cool discussion!)
From: Julian Feinauer
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2019 1:10 AM
To: dev@iotdb.apache.org
Subject: Re: IoTDB supports distributed version
Hi,
this is a very in
Hi Felix,
could you elaborate a bit on your use cases?
I am a bit unsure about the consistency, so it would be interesting to hear
where you see the important points.
Thanks!
Julian
Am 31.03.19, 20:25 schrieb "Felix Cheung" :
I, on the other hand, would be very interested in the strong co
The use case I’m thinking about for time series data is a bit sensitive for
data loss. Suppose for transaction records.
I think I’d generally agree on A in CAP too. But is it going to be eventual
consistency? Or it could split brain and lose data?
From: Julian
Hi Felix,
yes, I see, this, indeed would feature the C.
As we are usually very "edge" focused we do not care that much about the P as
we have no or very few replications, so no big danger of splits.
But it is questionable in this situation whether one wants ot use the Server or
sticks to the tsf
Hi,
IoTDB/TsFile can run on a device (edge side), and in a data center.
Firstly, when we say the distributed version, we refer to the latter. If we
run IoTDB/TsFile on the edge, our current design is not for letting these
IoTDB instances forming a cluster. What we need to support is letting these
