On 23/05/12 08:48, Mario Ds Briggs wrote:
thanks Andy for the elaborate response. Yes i was looking at Fuseki for the
SPARQL Graph Store Protocol support.
I am also aware of ARQ's Query extension points, but we dont implement the
QueryEngineFactory interface and thats why my question.
[4] [1] d
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-248?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Seaborne resolved JENA-248.
Resolution: Fixed
> Fuseki server unresponsive when running multiple construct queries using
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-248?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Seaborne reassigned JENA-248:
--
Assignee: Andy Seaborne
> Fuseki server unresponsive when running multiple construct queries
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-248?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Seaborne updated JENA-248:
---
Component/s: ARQ
Affects Version/s: ARQ 2.9.0
Fix Version/s: ARQ 2.9.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-248?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13281872#comment-13281872
]
Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-248:
Committed to the codebase (and patch attached for r
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-248?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13281859#comment-13281859
]
Hudson commented on JENA-248:
-
Integrated in Jena_ARQ #610 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/J
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-248?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Seaborne updated JENA-248:
---
Attachment: JENA-248-materialize-result-bytes.patch
> Fuseki server unresponsive when running mult
I'm on it.
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 5:24 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> Could somebody please work out how to get users@j.a.o and dev@j.a.o archived
> at markmail and make it so.
>
> I think markmail sees the list as jena-users@incubator still but I ran out
> of time to explore it.
>
> mail-archives.a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-248?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13281594#comment-13281594
]
Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-248:
Thanks - that tells me the changes since 0.2.1 aren
On 23 May 2012, at 13:24, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> Could somebody please work out how to get users@j.a.o and dev@j.a.o archived
> at markmail and make it so.
>
> I think markmail sees the list as jena-users@incubator still but I ran out of
> time to explore it.
>
> mail-archives.apache.org/mod_
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-248?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13281572#comment-13281572
]
Rahul Sharma commented on JENA-248:
---
Tried with Fuseki 0.2.2-SNAPSHOT 20120522-0501 and sa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-248?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13281566#comment-13281566
]
Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-248:
Could you try with the current snapshot development
Could somebody please work out how to get users@j.a.o and dev@j.a.o
archived at markmail and make it so.
I think markmail sees the list as jena-users@incubator still but I ran
out of time to explore it.
mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ still has jena-users@i.a.o separate
from users@j.a.o b
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-248?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13281549#comment-13281549
]
Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-248:
This looks like it's the connection saturation issu
Rahul Sharma created JENA-248:
-
Summary: Fuseki server unresponsive when running multiple
construct queries using multi-threading.
Key: JENA-248
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-248
Projec
thanks Andy for the elaborate response. Yes i was looking at Fuseki for the
SPARQL Graph Store Protocol support.
I am also aware of ARQ's Query extension points, but we dont implement the
QueryEngineFactory interface and thats why my question.
[4] [1] does have this 'While it is possible to repla
16 matches
Mail list logo