Github user pmouawad commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/26#issuecomment-120600212
Thanks for your contribution.
It has been integrated with some slight changes within :
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58122
http
Github user pmouawad commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/28#discussion_r42308993
--- Diff:
src/components/org/apache/jmeter/extractor/json/jsonpath/JSONManager.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user pmouawad commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/28#discussion_r42309300
--- Diff: xdocs/usermanual/component_reference.xml ---
@@ -6078,6 +6080,34 @@ This can be useful if your JDBC Sample changes some
data and you want to reset
Github user pmouawad commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/21#issuecomment-148918446
Hello,
Thanks for the offer of the code.
The plugin seems to the team to be rather specialized, and unlikely to be
used by many other JMeter users
Github user pmouawad commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/29#issuecomment-157161782
Thanks, fixed
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user pmouawad commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/29#issuecomment-157170292
Hi,
Absolutely.
Regards
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user pmouawad commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/26#issuecomment-160441530
Hi,
Sorry for late reply.
Could you provide a PR based on current code so that I see what you mean ?
Thanks
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user pmouawad commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/26#issuecomment-160442852
After further analysis, I understand you might be talking about the piece
of code in GraphiteBackendListenerClient#addMetrics
Github user pmouawad commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/32#issuecomment-161085669
Fixed by :
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/jmeter/trunk/src/components/org/apache/jmeter/control/gui/ModuleControllerGui.java?view=diff&r1=1717512&r2=1717513
Github user pmouawad commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/35#issuecomment-161428163
Fixed by commit:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1717619&view=rev
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appea
Github user pmouawad commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/34#issuecomment-161428250
Fixed by commit:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1717618&view=rev
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appea
Github user pmouawad commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/40#issuecomment-161957773
Fixed by http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1717952&view=rev
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHu
Github user pmouawad commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/39#issuecomment-161958032
Fixed by http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1717953&view=rev
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHu
Github user pmouawad commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/38#issuecomment-161958206
Fixed by http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1717954&view=rev
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHu
Github user pmouawad commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/42#issuecomment-163032210
Fixed by http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1718425&view=rev
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHu
GitHub user pmouawad opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/62
Migrate CookieManager to HC4.5.1 to allow migration to HC 4.5.1
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/ubikloadpack/jmeter HC4_5
Github user pmouawad closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/62
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user pmouawad opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/63
Migrate CookieManager to HC4.5.1
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/ubikloadpack/jmeter HC4_5
Alternatively you can review and
Github user pmouawad closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/63
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user pmouawad opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/64
Migrate CookieManager to HC4.5.1
Pull request migrating to HC 4.5.1
Fixing Test cases (thanks to the precious help of Oleg)
Fixing issue in current HC4CookieHandler
You can merge this pull
Github user pmouawad closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/64
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user pmouawad commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/24#issuecomment-167620360
Thanks for contribution , but would it be possible to customize it for
JMeter ?
I see lot of extensions that are not used and will never be in the project.
---
If
Github user pmouawad commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/64#issuecomment-167619954
Fixed through http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1721032&view=rev
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on Gi
Github user pmouawad commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/72#issuecomment-171421826
Hello,
First , big thanks for your PR.
We will have a look at it soon, but if teams agrees on integrating it to
Core, it should happen in N+2 release (not the
Github user pmouawad commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/91#issuecomment-176471792
Hi,
Thanks for PR.
I created https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58933 for follow
up.
@milamberspace I let you handle this.
@d0k1 , if
Github user pmouawad commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/72#issuecomment-178402985
Hi,
As I said, for nowwe are preparing the next version. This sampler if
acceptedby team would be in n+2 version.
I have opened a dev discussion regarding its
Github user pmouawad commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/92#issuecomment-180068466
I think this template can be useful to see a simple structure of a test
plan.
It is also used by the manual.
I use it for debugging.
So IMHO, we should keep
Github user pmouawad commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/93#issuecomment-180068637
I think this template can be useful to see a sample structure of a web
test plan.
It is also used by the manual.
I use it for debugging.
So IMHO, we should
Github user pmouawad commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/111#issuecomment-181113020
Hi,
Thanks for PR.
Do you think 404 is a good response code ?
Why not a 500 ?
Regards
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user pmouawad commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/126#issuecomment-185104753
Note from sebb on dev mailing list:
> -1
> Auto boxing is generally a bad idea as it can hide poor design (wrong
>choice of long/Long).
>
Github user pmouawad commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/126#issuecomment-185104857
Thanks for PR , if you can restrict it to String.format as per sebb notes.
Thanks
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user pmouawad commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/123#issuecomment-185315216
Note from sebb on dev mailing list:
> -1
> Auto boxing is generally a bad idea as it can hide poor design (wrong
>choice of long/Long).
>
Github user pmouawad commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/126#issuecomment-185315393
Yes :-) fixed the comments
Thanks
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user pmouawad commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/129#issuecomment-185728403
Hello,
I think there is an issue with your refactoring of AbstractGraphConsumer.
at lines 341 to 351, you have refactored the Map iteration but:
1) One
GitHub user pmouawad opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/135
Bug 59034 - Parallel downloads connection management is not realistic
Draft of a patch making parallel downloads more realistic by sharing the
HttpClient instance between Main browser thread and
GitHub user pmouawad opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/136
Bug 59034 - Parallel downloads connection management is not realistic
Based on https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/135 with following
improvements:
- no thread pool creation if there
Github user pmouawad commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/135#issuecomment-186914681
Replaced by PR-136
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user pmouawad closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/135
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user pmouawad commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/131#issuecomment-186923437
Hi,
At Team, Please avoid merging this PR for now as it would introduce a
conflict on :
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59033
which is
Github user pmouawad commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/136#issuecomment-186926416
Commited in trunk through:
- http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1731570&view=rev
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user pmouawad closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/136
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user pmouawad commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/141#issuecomment-189364775
Commited within:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1732514&view=rev
Thanks
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
r
Github user pmouawad commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/152#issuecomment-192498248
@milamberspace , I leave it to you ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user pmouawad commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/153#issuecomment-192499523
Thanks for contribution !
In my opinion, no need for an additional property unless you think there
might be a bug.
Could you provide a Test Plan with some
Github user pmouawad commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/131#issuecomment-192510866
Hello,
Thanks for PR.
Would it be possible to either resubmit it after 3.0 release or resubmit
one updated ?
Thanks
---
If your project is set up for
Github user pmouawad commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/155#issuecomment-194273164
Fixed within:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1734228&view=rev
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appea
Github user pmouawad commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/162#issuecomment-194522474
Hi Antonio,
If file name is empty what is the use of CSV DataSet ?
I think maybe we should make the test fail and stop , which does not appear
to be the
Github user pmouawad commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/148#issuecomment-198560249
pong
Thanks
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user pmouawad commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/168#issuecomment-197859425
Fixed with commit
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user pmouawad commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/168#issuecomment-197558458
Hello Maxime,
Could you provide a simple test plan showing the bug you faced ?
Thank you
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
GitHub user pmouawad opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/179
Bug 59258 : GUI Mode : OOM Protection for View Results Tree or View Results
in Table
This PR is a first try to base protection on memory estimation.
Memory estimation of SampleResult is too
Github user pmouawad commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/177#issuecomment-204964432
+1 for me once Tests that are broken due to the change of size are fixed
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user pmouawad commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/178#issuecomment-204965129
+1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user pmouawad commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/176#issuecomment-204965711
Hi Vladimir,
Exposing public method for testing might introduce issues.
Users can think that field is persisted in JMX while it's not.
Can
Github user pmouawad commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/176#issuecomment-204978544
+1 for me
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user pmouawad commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/176#issuecomment-204978538
Sorry , I had some hallucination although I checked twice :-) , it is
package protected.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user pmouawad commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/24#issuecomment-205054140
Fixed by :
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1737500&view=rev
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1737499&view=rev
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user pmouawad commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/193#issuecomment-210050073
Hi,
The choice was made to highlight transactions with upper error.
So the sorting based on Error% looks ok for me.
Clicking on the column to sort against
Github user pmouawad commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/182#issuecomment-210055924
I voluntarily made it like this because I found it more visible :-)
So I don't know what to do with this PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can rep
Github user pmouawad commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/182#issuecomment-210117693
Hi Antonio,
I would be very interested by a UX Expert proposal on all JMeter GUI :-),
not just this part.
This would really help us, provided the advice is not
Github user pmouawad commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/203#issuecomment-212119330
Hi Antonio,
I think it's a good idea.
But if you want to create a PR for docs, you must update changes.xml .
All html files are generated fro
Github user pmouawad commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/178#issuecomment-212119461
Hi @vlsi ,
Will you commit this ?
Thanks
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user pmouawad commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/177#issuecomment-212119570
Hi @vlsi ,
Will you commit this ?
Thanks
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user pmouawad closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/179
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user pmouawad commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/202#discussion_r60310491
--- Diff: src/components/org/apache/jmeter/control/IncludeController.java
---
@@ -121,19 +121,20 @@ protected HashTree loadIncludedElements
Github user pmouawad commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/205#issuecomment-214866111
Thanks for your tests and PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user pmouawad commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/209
Hi,
Thanks for contribution.
But I think it is too coarse as it allows choosing Folder where it does not
have a meaning.
You should make this more specific so that it applies only to
Github user pmouawad commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/210
@nitinpadalia , any update on this PR ?
Thanks
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user pmouawad commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/210
No problem. Will you submit a new PR taking into account the comments ?
Thanks
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user pmouawad commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/221
Hello @jloisel ,
Thanks for your contribution.
I agree with your analysis of "race condition" and it impact on
performances.
But do you have some benchmark that
Github user pmouawad commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/221
@jloisel , my note was not on using ConcurrentHashmap :-) (I am aware of
this),
but on the usage of Guava.
Ok thanks for feedback, I'll commit the PR after further review
---
If
Github user pmouawad commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/221
@vlsi, that was my main concern but @jloisel convinced me, if you have a
better option without guava , feel free to amend PR.
Shall I wait or do I commit ?
For now I may not commit the
Github user pmouawad commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/221
@vlsi regarding guava compatibility:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/21867295/is-guava-binary-compatible-with-previous-versions
Regarding your proposal, there is only 1
Github user pmouawad commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/221
>The idea is JMeter releases are very rare,
This is supposed to change :-)
>CHM has no way to evict old entries, ...
I hope you don't think I ignore that :-) What I mea
Github user pmouawad commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/221
Let's not diverge too much :-)
1. I opened a discussion threads on dev mailing list on Java8 migration.
2. @vlsi OSGI approach is a huge & complex piece of work, frankly I doubt
Github user pmouawad commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/221
@ben-manes , thanks for those clarifications and your work on CLHM and
caffeine, very interesting.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user pmouawad commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/224
Yes you're correct, I meant Text renderer but in that case formatting does
not really make sense as it can be anything (not only html)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user pmouawad commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/224
+1 for commiting it
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user pmouawad commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/225
Hello,
I find it interesting to have the version of libraries .
So I am not keen on changing it.
Regards
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user pmouawad commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/223
Hello,
In my opinion, you should commit it and we can improve it with further
commits.
I agree with @vlsi on the performance involvement of warn logging , but
we'll find a solution i
Github user pmouawad commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/221
Hello,
I'll wait 2 more days for reaction on guava subject.
Unless there is a nogo, I'll commit the patch as is.
Regards
---
If your project is set up for it, you can rep
Github user pmouawad commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/230
+1 for me
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user pmouawad commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/231
Hello,
Thanks for the patch.
First review look good to me.
Any reason for not using ThreadLocalRandom.current() instead of Random ?
Regards
Philippe
---
If your project is
Github user pmouawad commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/233
Thanks for this contribution !
We will review it ASAP and give you feedback.
Regards
Philippe M.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user pmouawad commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/233
Hi Thorson,
Sorry for late reply, we are in the middle of 3.1 release preparation and I
was on holiday.
Thanks again for you PR.
I started reviewing, few notes
Github user pmouawad commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/233
Hi Again,
For info, in your commit, no need to include the HTML files, only XML for
documentation.
Thanks
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user pmouawad commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/233
Hi @blindio ,
Did you have time working on the reported issues ?
Thanks
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user pmouawad commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/236
Hello,
Thanks for contribution.
Could you provide a screenshot of what the result will look like ?
Thank you
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user pmouawad commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/236
Thanks a lot for your screenshots which give a better view of the feature
and your work on this.
Unfortunately As discussed in :
- https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59937
Github user pmouawad commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/237
Hello @max3163,
Thank you for your contribution.
Could you (as requested by Felix) give more details on the use case for
this PR ?
Thank you
Regards
---
If your project is set up
Github user pmouawad commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/227
Hi Team,
Shall I merge this one ?
Thanks
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user pmouawad commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/241
Hello @loganmzz ,
Is this PR a duplicate of PR 239 ?
If so, could you close 239?
Did you check the performance impact of this feature ?
Thanks a lot for your contribution
Github user pmouawad commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/240
Thanks for contribution.
Few notes:
- docs (component-reference.xml) should be updated
- In handleError, I think you should surround close line 232 with try/catch
Github user pmouawad commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/237
Hello Team,
PR looks fine to me.
Do you agree with enhancement ?
Thank you
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user pmouawad commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/238
Thanks for contribution.
I reviewed the patch. It doesn't break current code but I think there may
be an issue in :
`Map.Entry entry =
allThreads.entrySet().iterator()
Github user pmouawad commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/238
See:
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60530
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user pmouawad commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/244
Hi Antonio,
I wouldn't create a bugzilla and a PR for only this.
Besides, the PR modifies other files that shouldn't .
In this particular case, just commit directly as you have
Github user pmouawad commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/243
Hi Antonio,
Same remark as for other PR.
Just commit directly the code unless you have a doubt.
Regards
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user pmouawad commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/237
@max3163 , are you using GraphiteBackendListener or something else (I don't
fully understand your comment on "I'm thinking to send a PR to share it too".
If not, why
Github user pmouawad commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/237
Hello,
Thanks for proposal.
What is the quantity of code ? Does it have any dependency on Influx
library or it is standalone using socket ?
Thank you
---
If your project is set up
1 - 100 of 303 matches
Mail list logo