> On Jun 15, 2018, at 8:29 AM, David Smiley wrote:
>
> I'm +1 to modify the Lucene-side JIRA QA bot (Yetus) to not execute Solr
> tests.
Right now, Yetus only executes Solr tests when there is a Solr change in the
patch; otherwise only Lucene tests are executed.
I just committed a modificat
tests that fail.
>>> It's not a question of triaging logs, it's a matter of Jenkins junit test
>>> runs reporting failures.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 4:25 PM, Martin Gainty wrote:
>>> Erick-
>>>
>>
gt; are mixed in with SEVERE errors
>>
>> Would it make sense to filter the errors based on severity ?
>>
>> https://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/util/logging/Level.html
>> Level (Java Platform SE 7 ) - Oracle Help Center
>> docs.oracle.com
>&g
a question of triaging logs, it's a matter of Jenkins junit test
>>> runs reporting failures.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 4:25 PM, Martin Gainty wrote:
>>> Erick-
>>>
>>> appears that style mis-application ma
>>
>> Would it make sense to filter the errors based on severity ?
>>
>> https://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/util/logging/Level.html
>> Level (Java Platform SE 7 ) - Oracle Help Center
>> docs.oracle.com
>> The Level class defines a set of stan
logging levels that can be used to
> control logging output. The logging Level objects are ordered and are
> specified by ordered integers.
> if you know Severity you can triage the SEVERE errors before working down to
> INFO errors
>
>
> WDYT?
> Martin
>
ow Severity you can triage the SEVERE errors before working down
> to INFO errors
>
> WDYT?
> Martin
> __
>
>
>
>
> --
> *From:* Erick Erickson
> *Sent:* Friday, June 15, 2018 1:05 PM
>
___
>
>
>
>
> --
> *From:* Erick Erickson
> *Sent:* Friday, June 15, 2018 1:05 PM
> *To:* dev@lucene.apache.org; Mark Miller
> *Subject:* Re: Status of solr tests
>
> Mark (and everyone).
>
> I'm trying to be somewhat conservative a
ge the SEVERE errors before working down to
INFO errors
WDYT?
Martin
__
From: Erick Erickson
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2018 1:05 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org; Mark Miller
Subject: Re: Status of solr tests
Mark (and ev
t execute Solr tests. We can and
>> > are
>> > trying to improve the stability of the Solr tests but even
>> > optimistically
>> > the practical reality is that it won't be good enough anytime soon.
>> > When we
>> > get there, we can reverse this.
won't be good enough anytime soon.
> When we
> > get there, we can reverse this.
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 3:32 AM Simon Willnauer <
> simon.willna...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> folks,
> >>
> >> I got more active
x27;t be good enough anytime soon. When we
> get there, we can reverse this.
>
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 3:32 AM Simon Willnauer
> wrote:
>>
>> folks,
>>
>> I got more active working on IndexWriter and Soft-Deletes etc. in the
>> last couple of weeks.
hen
we get there, we can reverse this.
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 3:32 AM Simon Willnauer
wrote:
> folks,
>
> I got more active working on IndexWriter and Soft-Deletes etc. in the
> last couple of weeks. It's a blast again and I really enjoy it. The
> one thing that is IMO not ac
folks,
I got more active working on IndexWriter and Soft-Deletes etc. in the
last couple of weeks. It's a blast again and I really enjoy it. The
one thing that is IMO not acceptable is the status of solr tests. I
tried so many times to get them passing on several different OSs but
it seems
14 matches
Mail list logo
