On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:28:02 +0100
Olivier Lamy wrote:
hourra to a new release of maven :)
+1 (non-binding)
works fine to me
thanks,
tony.
> Hi,
> We fixed 1 issue:
> https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=19088
>
> Staging repository:
> https://repository
On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 15:48:59 +0100
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
thanks,
tony.
> Hi,
>
> We solved N issues:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11127&styleName=Html&version=18318
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
> http://jira.codehaus.
+1
Regards,
Hervé
Le dimanche 17 février 2013 15:48:59 Dennis Lundberg a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> We solved N issues:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11127&styleName=H
> tml&version=18318
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secu
I got distracted by some sparkly thing... I will reboot shortly... Still
waiting for a good entry to use as a starting hook though
On Wednesday, 20 February 2013, Barrie Treloar wrote:
> This has been quite for about 10 days.
>
> Is there any consensus on what the update should look like?
>
> ---
This has been quite for about 10 days.
Is there any consensus on what the update should look like?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
With a request-object we have to pass only one object instead of a lot of
arguments.
This makes it a lot easier to maintain, because the method signature will
never change.
It's no problem to add new fields to the request.
The same counts for response-objects, when used.
Most request-object f
2013/2/19 Jesse Glick :
> On 02/19/2013 10:28 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>>
>> We fixed 1 issue:
>>
>> https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=19088
>
>
> I guess this means that fixes such as MNG-5312 are deferred to another
> release like 3.1.0?
correct.
>
>
> [1] h
Hi Stuart,
> Setting aside the issue of whether DefaultInvocationRequest should
> really be a component, note that @Component by default defines
> a singleton component. You need to add:
instantiationStrategy = "per-lookup"
to get a new instance on every lookup, otherwise you'd always get
On 02/19/2013 10:28 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
We fixed 1 issue:
https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=19088
I guess this means that fixes such as MNG-5312 are deferred to another release
like 3.1.0?
[1] https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-5312
---
+1
Op Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:28:02 +0100 schreef Olivier Lamy :
Hi,
We fixed 1 issue:
https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=19088
Staging repository:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-270/
Staging distribution:
https://dist.apache.org/re
On 19 Feb 2013, at 15:28, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Hi,
> We fixed 1 issue:
> https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=19088
^ see also
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10335&version=18697
for what went into Wagon 2.4
> Staging repository:
+1
S.
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Hi,
> We fixed 1 issue:
>
> https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=19088
>
> Staging repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-270/
>
> Staging distribution:
> https://d
On 19 Feb 2013, at 18:08, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote:
> Hi Robert,
> Hi Stuart,
>
> > InvocationRequest is not a Component, it is just an interface for
>> DefaultInvocationRequest.
>
> oh my lord... ;-(
>
> Thanks for enlighten me...
>
> Which means in other words to make the InvocationRequest
Hi Robert,
Hi Stuart,
> InvocationRequest is not a Component, it is just an interface for
DefaultInvocationRequest.
oh my lord... ;-(
Thanks for enlighten me...
Which means in other words to make the InvocationRequest being a
component it's missing simply this:
@Component( role = Invocati
On 19 Feb 2013, at 17:39, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote:
> Hi,
>
> currently I'm working on a plugin which works so far so good...but now i
> stumbled over a problem which i didn't understand...
>
> I have a dependency to maven-invoker artifact:
>
>
>org.apache.maven.shared
>
InvocationRequest is not a Component, it is just an interface for
DefaultInvocationRequest.
Just use:
InvocationRequest request = new DefaultInvocationRequest();
Robert
Op Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:39:45 +0100 schreef Karl Heinz Marbaise
:
Hi,
currently I'm working on a plugin which works so
Hi,
currently I'm working on a plugin which works so far so good...but now i
stumbled over a problem which i didn't understand...
I have a dependency to maven-invoker artifact:
org.apache.maven.shared
maven-invoker
2.1.1
I have the following annotations
Thanks for the patch.
Before releasing, I will wait some days if any other issues.
2013/2/19 Mirko Friedenhagen :
> Hello,
>
> I created an issue[1] and supplied a small fix with working unittests
> and tested integratively against the project mentioned in the ticket,
> got the expected output of
Hi,
+1 (non binding from me).
Tested serveral project no regressions found.
Kind regards
Karl-Heinz Marbaise
--
SoftwareEntwicklung Beratung SchulungTel.: +49 (0) 2405 / 415 893
Dipl.Ing.(FH) Karl-Heinz MarbaiseICQ#: 135949029
Hauptstrasse 177 USt.IdNr: DE191
+1
On 19 February 2013 15:28, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Hi,
> We fixed 1 issue:
>
> https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=19088
>
> Staging repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-270/
>
> Staging distribution:
> https://dist.apache
Hi,
We fixed 1 issue:
https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=19088
Staging repository:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-270/
Staging distribution:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/maven/maven-3/3.0.5/
Vote open for 72H
[+1]
[0]
[-
We actually still support forking all the way down to 1.3.
The reason we have no issues for this is
A) No-one is using it.
B) it works as advertised.
Take your pick ;)
Kristian
2013/2/19 Stephen Connolly
> On 19 February 2013 09:37, Stephen Connolly <
> stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com
> > wr
On 19 February 2013 09:37, Stephen Connolly wrote:
>
>
>
> On 18 February 2013 21:55, Julien Nicoulaud wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the heads up.
>>
>> I took a deeper look at Surefire code, and it seems to me this could be
>> done directly on the client side by just wrapping
>> CommandLineUtils.execut
On 18 February 2013 21:55, Julien Nicoulaud wrote:
> Thanks for the heads up.
>
> I took a deeper look at Surefire code, and it seems to me this could be
> done directly on the client side by just wrapping
> CommandLineUtils.executeCommandLine() in ForkStarter (
>
> https://github.com/apache/maven
+1
2013/2/17 Dennis Lundberg :
> Hi,
>
> We solved N issues:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11127&styleName=Html&version=18318
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=11127&status=1
>
>
25 matches
Mail list logo
