Re: Fw: [discussion] Improving poms on ibiblio

2006-03-14 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 3/14/06, Grzegorz Słowikowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have prepared poms for all Tomcat 5.5.15 artifacts, but I have some questions. Should I open Bugzilla ticket with these questions or ask you first? I'm still not sure who is in charge of these poms. Did Geronimo just do it once for

Re: Fw: [discussion] Improving poms on ibiblio

2006-03-14 Thread Jacek Laskowski
06-03-14, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisał(a): I'm still not sure who is in charge of these poms. Did Geronimo just do it once for the Tomcat version they needed? Jacek? That's exactly how we (=Geronimo team) did it. When there was a need for these jars, Jeff or me cut and published

Re: [discussion] Improving poms on ibiblio

2006-03-06 Thread Jacek Laskowski
06-03-06, Grzegorz Słowikowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisał(a): Hi Wendy Now I have some time and I started preparing poms for all Tomcat artifacts. I have checked out all modules from svn (tags TOMCAT_5_5_15) and now I'm preparing poms for them. I already see, that I will have many questions.

Re: [discussion] Improving poms on ibiblio

2006-03-06 Thread Grzegorz Słowikowski
- Original Message - From: Jacek Laskowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Maven Developers List dev@maven.apache.org Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 3:09 PM Subject: Re: [discussion] Improving poms on ibiblio 06-03-06, Grzegorz Słowikowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisał(a): Hi Wendy Now I have

Re: [discussion] Improving poms on ibiblio

2006-03-05 Thread Grzegorz Słowikowski
- Original Message - From: Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Maven Developers List dev@maven.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 4:00 PM Subject: Re: [discussion] Improving poms on ibiblio On 2/28/06, Grzegorz Słowikowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I analyzed ALL Tomcat 5.5.9

[discussion] Improving poms on ibiblio

2006-02-28 Thread Grzegorz Słowikowski
Hi all We know there are many errors in poms on ibiblio. I would like to help to improve some of them. There are some areas I am interesting most. First Tomcat 5.5.x. I analyzed ALL Tomcat 5.5.9, 5.5.12 and 5.5.15 ibiblio artifacts. What I found is: - all 5.5.9 and 5.5.12 artifacts have empty

Re: [discussion] Improving poms on ibiblio

2006-02-28 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 2/28/06, Grzegorz Słowikowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I analyzed ALL Tomcat 5.5.9, 5.5.12 and 5.5.15 ibiblio artifacts. What I found is: - all 5.5.9 and 5.5.12 artifacts have empty poms - only modelVersion, groupId, artifactId and version tags, no dependencies!! - all 5.5.15 artifacts

Re: [discussion] Improving poms on ibiblio

2006-02-28 Thread Jacek Laskowski
06-02-28, Grzegorz Słowikowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisał(a): There are some areas I am interesting most. First Tomcat 5.5.x. I analyzed ALL Tomcat 5.5.9, 5.5.12 and 5.5.15 ibiblio artifacts. What I found is: - all 5.5.9 and 5.5.12 artifacts have empty poms - only modelVersion, groupId,

Re: [discussion] Improving poms on ibiblio

2006-02-28 Thread John Casey
Hi, my replies are inline. Cheers, John [snip] I analyzed ALL Tomcat 5.5.9, 5.5.12 and 5.5.15 ibiblio artifacts. What I found is: - all 5.5.9 and 5.5.12 artifacts have empty poms - only modelVersion, groupId, artifactId and version tags, no dependencies!! - all 5.5.15 artifacts have NO

Re: [discussion] Improving poms on ibiblio

2006-02-28 Thread Carlos Sanchez
John is right, we stopped not long ago creating those poms that had only minimal information. We prefer not having metadata than having that, at least you now get a warning about it and if someone fixes the pom you'll get it right away without having to delete stuff in your local repo. On