yes
On 6/8/06, Lukas Theussl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You mean groupId=maven, artifactId=dom4j-1.7-20060507 or something like
that?
-Lukas
Carlos Sanchez wrote:
> Well, as far as they go under the maven group should be ok. the only
> problem I think is the confusion, so description in pom sh
You mean groupId=maven, artifactId=dom4j-1.7-20060507 or something like
that?
-Lukas
Carlos Sanchez wrote:
Well, as far as they go under the maven group should be ok. the only
problem I think is the confusion, so description in pom should be
clear
On 6/6/06, Lukas Theussl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Well, as far as they go under the maven group should be ok. the only
problem I think is the confusion, so description in pom should be
clear
On 6/6/06, Lukas Theussl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi devs,
Maven 1.1-beta-3 is almost ready but still waiting for some external
library releases that f
Hi devs,
Maven 1.1-beta-3 is almost ready but still waiting for some external
library releases that fix some important bugs/regressions. We would need
in particular new versions of jelly, dom4j and velocity, which are all
pretty inactive projects right now. I've been running a version of M1.1