Do we *really* need it anymore ?
As far as we don't package MINA with the rxtx.jar lib, we should be
safe, legally speaking. And it's as simple as defining the rxtx
dependency as provided, AFAIK.
If we can get rid of this profile, things would be quite easier for
everybody, including the po
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 6:27 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
> As far as we don't package MINA with the rxtx.jar lib, we should be safe,
> legally speaking. And it's as simple as defining the rxtx dependency as
> provided, AFAIK.
I thought the idea was that the user should be made aware before Maven
On 9/16/10 8:23 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 6:27 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
As far as we don't package MINA with the rxtx.jar lib, we should be safe,
legally speaking. And it's as simple as defining the rxtx dependency as
provided, AFAIK.
I thought the idea was that
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 8:56 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> so here is what we will have in the release, to clarify the mess, and to be
> sure I'm not forgetting anything :
> - we will use the -Pserial profile to build the transport-serial module
> - when building the distribution, the transport-s
On 9/16/10 9:47 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
FYI, if you want to test the new distribution process, you can run :
mvn clean install -Papache-release -Dmaven.test.skip
Why are maven.test.skip needed?
Just to speed up the execution. But if you have 10 minutes to lose, feel
free to run withou
