re +1 votes and more positive then
> > > negative as soon as the 72 hours hits.
> > >
> > > Mike
> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 2:44 AM Justin Mclean
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > forgot to CC dev
> > >
:44 AM Justin Mclean
> > wrote:
> >
> > > forgot to CC dev
> > >
> > > > Begin forwarded message:
> > > >
> > > > From: Justin Mclean
> > > > Subject: Re: [RESTARTING][VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating)
>
:
> > >
> > > From: Justin Mclean
> > > Subject: Re: [RESTARTING][VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating)
> > version 1.4.0.rc2
> > > Date: 13 February 2019 at 6:43:48 pm AEDT
> > > To: Michael Wall
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
&
as soon as the 72 hours hits.
Mike
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 2:44 AM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> forgot to CC dev
>
> > Begin forwarded message:
> >
> > From: Justin Mclean
> > Subject: Re: [RESTARTING][VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating)
> version 1.4.0.rc2
>
forgot to CC dev
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> From: Justin Mclean
> Subject: Re: [RESTARTING][VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version
> 1.4.0.rc2
> Date: 13 February 2019 at 6:43:48 pm AEDT
> To: Michael Wall
>
> Hi,
>
>> Option 1:
>> Do n
Thanks for the detailed explanation and the help on educating the community,
Michael.
People on the general list are spending time to help us get the licensing
right. If possible, I think we should be thankful by treating their feedbacks
more seriously, making the efforts to quickly fix the pro
I think I misunderstood the 3rd party reference to imply Uber instead
of the 3rd party folder. I feel the same regardless, and defer to the
experts on what do do about the 3rd party folder.
As for the other license issues, we don't have to add license info to
readme or informational files. It is s
Hi Qing,
I see 3 options
Option 1:
Do nothing. I don't know how a RESTARTED vote works. Steffen counted the
binding votes from the before it was restarted. Unsure if that actually
works. There has been one +1 votes since the restart, but it is
non-binding as best I can tell even though it lab
Hi Michael,
Could you please guide how to proceed with this? Given that we have a
possibility of announcing MXNet support in Horovod with their next release and
this would help MXNet increase our visibility.
Thanks,
Qing
On 2/12/19, 2:16 PM, "Michael Wall" wrote:
Team,
Here is
Team,
Here is my read on the situation. The vote has been canceled. Justin's
point was that a -1 doesn't mean you must cancel a vote for the reasons he
outlined. But here the vote needs to be restarted and the issue Luciano
found needs to be addressed.
That issue is that there are files in MXN
+1
I disagree about 3rd party considerations. This is an ecosystem after all.
The distributed training story is quite nice with Horovod. Given my
interaction with tensorflow with Horovod and dynamic training with MXNet
and the kvstore, this new route is, IMO, easier to setup and manage.
I see the
Hi -
Third party vendor considerations do not matter. Are you voting +1 with your
Apache hat on or your Amazon hat?
Regards,
Dave
> On Feb 11, 2019, at 10:16 PM, Lin Yuan wrote:
>
> +1 binding
> Horovod is going to release it's 0.16.0 in the coming week with MXNet
> integration. We need to re
+1 binding
Horovod is going to release it's 0.16.0 in the coming week with MXNet
integration. We need to release 1.4.0 which includes all the dependencies
for Horovod integration.
Best,
Lin
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 9:30 PM Steffen Rochel
wrote:
> Dear community -
> based on Justin's and communi
Dear community -
based on Justin's and community feedback I'm suggesting to restart the vote.
Current status:
binding votes:
+1: 2 votes (Henri, Jason)
-1: 1 vote (Luciano)
non-binding:
+1: 1 vote (Kellen)
The community is investigating feedback from Luciano that the exclusion
file is to broad a
14 matches
Mail list logo
