2018 at 1:17 AM, Can Balioglu wrote:
> Hi Pedro,
>
> Actually my team had the exact same requirement and we now have an internal
> MXNet package with all the necessary header files. Note that if you have some
> custom operators and plan to write an extension library for them, you ar
Hi Pedro,
Actually my team had the exact same requirement and we now have an internal
MXNet package with all the necessary header files. Note that if you have some
custom operators and plan to write an extension library for them, you are going
to need to copy not only the public header files
Hi Pedro,
Canonical added snap package for MXNet last year:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/4852
Would be good to verify if it works for your use case.
Anirudh
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 1:49 PM, Marco de Abreu <
marco.g.ab...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Sounds like a great idea! Pleas
Sounds like a great idea! Please also consider the issues labelled as Cpp
package on GitHub.
-Marco
Am 14.02.2018 6:48 nachm. schrieb "Pedro Larroy" <
pedro.larroy.li...@gmail.com>:
> Hi
>
> We would like to use MXNet from C++ without Python. Currently the cpp
> package depends on additional MXN
Hi
We would like to use MXNet from C++ without Python. Currently the cpp
package depends on additional MXNet headers, nnvm and dmlc.
As far as I know we don't have a standalone package of MXNet with
library + headers.
I would like to create a deb package of MXNet for example which has
the librar
