Hi Paul,
I was able to reproduce the GenerateTableFetch processor issue
reported by NIFI-4395.
Please go ahead and provide a PR, I can review it.
Thanks,
Koji
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 1:10 PM, Paul Gibeault (pagibeault)
wrote:
> We have submitted this JIRA ticket:
> https://issues.apache.org/jir
We have submitted this JIRA ticket:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4395
This issue causes GenerateTableFetch processor to malfunction after a server
restart.
We are very interested in getting this released in 1.4.0 and are willing to
provide the PR if there is still time.
Thanks,
P
One final note, is that I intend to move all CPP related issues to this
tracker. The full thought process is captured on the JIRA [1].
In quick summary though, JIRA will redirect all issues to their new
location/issue and versions are getting mapped to those in the MINIFICPP
project without the "
Great! Thanks!
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 9:56 AM, Aldrin Piri wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> The new JIRA project is now live. Please make use of that when filing C++
> related JIRAs. I am going to start moving appropriate items to that
> instance.
>
> On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 2:13 PM, Aldrin Piri wrote
Glad to hear it! Thanks for taking the time.
-Andy I.C.
On 9/19/17, 9:57 AM, "Aldrin Piri" wrote:
Hey folks,
The new JIRA project is now live. Please make use of that when filing C++
related JIRAs. I am going to start moving appropriate items to that
instance.
On
Created an issue for this functionality [1]. Please change issue properties
and comment as necessary.
-Nick
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4398
On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 4:55 PM, Matt Burgess wrote:
> +1 for FlattenRecord as well. In the meantime you can use
> ExecuteScript or I
All,
There are a couple of issues with open PRs that i think would be
desirable to get into 1.4.0:
- https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2163 - trivial one-liner in
ListenGRPC
- https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1985 - support TLS algorithm
selection via SSLContextService in HandleHTTPRe
I agree with including only those which can be completed quickly in 1.4.0.
We are anxious for the next release to begin exercising some of the new
features. IMO it's time to get 1.4.0 out the door.
Thanks,
Mark
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 6:59 PM, Jeff wrote:
> Still good. Was looking through tick
I started working on this and have PutHBaseCell, PutHBaseJSON and
FetchHBaseRow working with it. I'm following a loose convention that goes
like this:
1. Option of sane default for visibility boolean string where appropriate,
but the string is not required.
2. User defines the list of tokens that
Hey folks,
The new JIRA project is now live. Please make use of that when filing C++
related JIRAs. I am going to start moving appropriate items to that
instance.
On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 2:13 PM, Aldrin Piri wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> I entered an issue (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MINI
Peter,
What you outlined here is all correct, with a small exception. If you have
multiple versions of the same processor loaded into your flow (applicable only
to 1.3, or perhaps 1.2?), you will also see the Processor class re-instantiated
when you right-click on a Processor and choose to chan
11 matches
Mail list logo