Hi,
Similar kind of fix is applicable to
RequirementServices.createAutoRequirementsForOrder as well, so that
ProductStore.requirementMethodEnumId works with PRODRQM_AUTO value.
--
Thanks,
Mridul Pathak
On 03-Sep-09, at 9:12 AM, David E Jones wrote:
Thanks for the comments Scott. I
Hi Ruth,
In my opinion this would fit more at
http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBADMIN/OFBiz+Related+Books (learning section)
Jacques
From: "Ruth Hoffman"
Hello David and the List:
Well, seems I've been able to add the content I'd like to have placed in
the OFBADMIN space to the OFBIZ Wiki sp
Hi Ashish,
No problems. I wish to continue to watch the community and get involved
as the opportunities rise.
I would like to help with any future support on this issue too :)
Thanks,
-Vadiraj.
Ashish Vijaywargiya (JIRA) wrote:
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2374?page=com.a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2374?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12750823#action_12750823
]
Ashish Vijaywargiya commented on OFBIZ-2374:
Thanks a lot Jacques for committin
Thanks for the comments Scott. I made some changes that will hopefully
address these two issues, ie making it more readable and allowing the
Product setting to override the ProductStore setting, in SVN rev 810772.
-David
On Sep 2, 2009, at 7:53 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
I saw them but yeah I
I saw them but yeah I have read the code wrong, my pseudo code should
have an OR instead of an AND:
if product requirement is PRODRQM_ATP OR productStore requirement is
PRODRQM_ATP then run the rest of the code in the block
shouldn't one setting take priority or override over the other? If
You're missing the nots...
-David
On Sep 2, 2009, at 7:28 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
Hi David
I'm not familiar with the code but the condition seems a little
strange to me, it used to be this:
if product requirement is PRODRQM_ATP then run the rest of the code
in the block
Now it looks like
Hi David
I'm not familiar with the code but the condition seems a little
strange to me, it used to be this:
if product requirement is PRODRQM_ATP then run the rest of the code in
the block
Now it looks like this:
if product requirement is PRODRQM_ATP AND productStore requirement is
also PR
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2891?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-2891.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Jacques Le Roux
Thanks Erwan,
Your patch is in trunk at r810
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2889?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12750618#action_12750618
]
David E. Jones commented on OFBIZ-2889:
---
The run-parent-actions element would have th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2891?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12750612#action_12750612
]
Erwan de FERRIERES commented on OFBIZ-2891:
---
Hi Jacques,
I've also tested in fir
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2889?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12750609#action_12750609
]
Adrian Crum commented on OFBIZ-2889:
The current form behavior is preserved: if child a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2891?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12750607#action_12750607
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-2891:
Hi Erwan,
I did not read all the article
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2889?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12750598#action_12750598
]
Harmeet Bedi commented on OFBIZ-2889:
-
I assume if there is no actions block, it would
Hello David and the List:
Well, seems I've been able to add the content I'd like to have placed in
the OFBADMIN space to the OFBIZ Wiki space. Please take a look:
http://docs.ofbiz.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=9071
Would it be possible to have this moved over to the OFBADMIN space and
pl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12750575#action_12750575
]
Derek Young commented on OFBIZ-2468:
Arun's patch worked for me.
Thanks.
> Links to d
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2889?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12750569#action_12750569
]
Adrian Crum commented on OFBIZ-2889:
As I mentioned on the mailing list, I think this w
One question that was posed to me today was why a store operation on a
GenericValue causes the database to get hit with a "basically" noop database
update. A couple of things that were interesting:
- GenericEntity.set(...) will (unless value is null and null is ignored)
always run through logic
I have attached to files to the patch. The one has a unittest that exposes
the problem with the caching. The second contains two fixes that resolve
the issue (and cause the unittest to pass).
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/EntityList-cache-issues-...-tp25179637p25262321
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2882?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bob Morley updated OFBIZ-2882:
--
Attachment: OFBIZ-2882_EntityCacheListFix.patch
Includes the fix as well as the entitytests.xml update
Thanks a lot Jacques and Ashish,
I appreciate your help and glad that my work finally gets into the source :)
-Vadiraj.
Jacques Le Roux (JIRA) wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2374?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2882?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bob Morley updated OFBIZ-2882:
--
Attachment: OFBIZ-2882_EntityCacheListTest.patch
This file contains a new unit test class for cache and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2891?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Erwan de FERRIERES updated OFBIZ-2891:
--
Attachment: OFBIZ-2891.patch
stupidIE6.png
> ie6 and bluelight
> --
ie6 and bluelight
-
Key: OFBIZ-2891
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2891
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: ALL COMPONENTS
Affects Versions: SVN trunk
Reporter: Erwan
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2374?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-2374.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks Vadiraj,
I commited your patch in trunk at revision: 810581.
I also m
Done at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2206
Thanks Sebastian
Jacques
From: "sebb"
On 18/08/2009, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hi Sebastian,
It seems that we are unable to do it ourself. Could you help, or tell how
we could get some help, please ?
Please file a JIRA issue (INFRA p
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2890?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-2890.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: SVN trunk
Thanks Abdullah,
Your patch is in trunk at r
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Arun Patidar updated OFBIZ-2468:
Attachment: DeleteProductStoreFromPromo.patch
Here is patch for issue reported by Mario on user mai
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2886?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12750372#action_12750372
]
Amit Sharma commented on OFBIZ-2886:
Thanks Ashish!
--
Amit Sharma
> Add support on a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2886?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ashish Vijaywargiya closed OFBIZ-2886.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks Amit & Rishi - Done at r810434.
--
Ashish
> Add support on a
From: "Hans Bakker"
Hi Jacques
We did not yet found a good WYSIWYG editor. However the xml editors in
Eclipse provide a reasonable environment in creating the text files.
Also realize that these files are now part of the ofbiz system which is
the domain of the programmer who should know abo
31 matches
Mail list logo