gt; >
> > >
> > > > On 22-May-2020, at 1:03 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
> > > jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > We have 5, 8 years old, , "@deprecated No replacement" references
gt; +1 to remove references.
> >
> > Thanks.
> > --
> > Mridul Pathak
> >
> >
> > > On 22-May-2020, at 1:03 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
> > jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > We have 5, 8
Roux <
> jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > We have 5, 8 years old, , "@deprecated No replacement" references in
> Java code:
> > https://ofbiz.markmail.org/search/?q=%22%40deprecated+No+replacement%22
> >
> >
+1 to remove references.
Thanks.
--
Mridul Pathak
> On 22-May-2020, at 1:03 PM, Jacques Le Roux
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We have 5, 8 years old, , "@deprecated No replacement" references in Java
> code:
> https://ofbiz.markmail.org/search/?q=%22%40deprecat
+1 to remove the "@deprecated No replacement" references.
--
Best Regards,
Suraj Khurana
Senior Technical Consultant
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 1:03 PM Jacques Le Roux <
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have 5, 8 years old, , "@deprecated No replacem
Hi,
We have 5, 8 years old, , "@deprecated No replacement" references in Java code:
https://ofbiz.markmail.org/search/?q=%22%40deprecated+No+replacement%22
It seems they are all related to Minilang. I think we should either remove the
concerned methods.
Or rather, easier,
