[GitHub] incubator-pirk pull request #87: [Trivial]: minor fixes

2016-09-02 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/incubator-pirk/pull/87 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature

[GitHub] incubator-pirk issue #87: [Trivial]: minor fixes

2016-09-02 Thread smarthi
Github user smarthi commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-pirk/pull/87 Merging this.. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so,

[GitHub] incubator-pirk pull request #87: [Trivial]: minor fixes

2016-09-02 Thread smarthi
GitHub user smarthi opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-pirk/pull/87 [Trivial]: minor fixes You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/smarthi/incubator-pirk sundry Alternatively you can review and ap

[GitHub] incubator-pirk pull request #85: [PIRK-61] - Es-Nodes Option Not Parsed by R...

2016-09-02 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/incubator-pirk/pull/85 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature

[GitHub] incubator-pirk pull request #86: [Trivial]: Add Storm to the list of support...

2016-09-02 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/incubator-pirk/pull/86 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature

[GitHub] incubator-pirk issue #86: [Trivial]: Add Storm to the list of supported plat...

2016-09-02 Thread smarthi
Github user smarthi commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-pirk/pull/86 Merging this now --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes s

[GitHub] incubator-pirk issue #85: [PIRK-61] - Es-Nodes Option Not Parsed by Responde...

2016-09-02 Thread smarthi
Github user smarthi commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-pirk/pull/85 merging this now. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes

[GitHub] incubator-pirk pull request #86: [Trivial]: Add Storm to the list of support...

2016-09-02 Thread smarthi
GitHub user smarthi opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-pirk/pull/86 [Trivial]: Add Storm to the list of supported platforms You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/smarthi/incubator-pirk sundry Al

Broken link

2016-09-02 Thread Suneel Marthi
Link - 'Making Releases' on http://pirk.incubator.apache.org/for_developers#release-process is broken

[GitHub] incubator-pirk issue #85: [PIRK-61] - Es-Nodes Option Not Parsed by Responde...

2016-09-02 Thread smarthi
Github user smarthi commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-pirk/pull/85 These changes look good, longer term goal should be to switch to using typesafe like configuration properties (from the present flat properties files). --- If your project is set up for it,

[GitHub] incubator-pirk issue #85: [PIRK-61] - Es-Nodes Option Not Parsed by Responde...

2016-09-02 Thread smarthi
Github user smarthi commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-pirk/pull/85 +1 Lgtm --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so,

[GitHub] incubator-pirk pull request #84: Fix deprecated Api calls and other minor fi...

2016-09-02 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/incubator-pirk/pull/84 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature

[GitHub] incubator-pirk pull request #85: [PIRK-61] - Es-Nodes Option Not Parsed by R...

2016-09-02 Thread ellisonanne
GitHub user ellisonanne opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-pirk/pull/85 [PIRK-61] - Es-Nodes Option Not Parsed by ResponderCLI You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/ellisonanne/incubator-pirk pir

[GitHub] incubator-pirk issue #84: Fix deprecated Api calls and other minor fixes.

2016-09-02 Thread ellisonanne
Github user ellisonanne commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-pirk/pull/84 Discovered a bug that was recently introduced in the code (PIRK-61) while testing this PR - am fixing and will push a PR in a few - with the changes that will be in the PIRK-61 PR, this PR

[GitHub] incubator-pirk issue #84: Fix deprecated Api calls and other minor fixes.

2016-09-02 Thread ellisonanne
Github user ellisonanne commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-pirk/pull/84 Looks good on initial review - I will run it through the distributed test suite and report back --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appea

Re: Draft for Review - Apache Pirk September Podling Report

2016-09-02 Thread Ellison Anne Williams
Submitted. Mentors - please review. Thanks! On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Suneel Marthi wrote: > +1 > > On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Ellison Anne Williams < > eawilli...@apache.org > > wrote: > > > I will make the changes discussed above, and replace the goal of > different > > release cycl

Re: Draft for Review - Apache Pirk September Podling Report

2016-09-02 Thread Suneel Marthi
+1 On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Ellison Anne Williams wrote: > I will make the changes discussed above, and replace the goal of different > release cycles with a goal to improve the user documentation and examples > in the codebase and on the website (I think that we can all cheer for that >

Re: Draft for Review - Apache Pirk September Podling Report

2016-09-02 Thread Ellison Anne Williams
I will make the changes discussed above, and replace the goal of different release cycles with a goal to improve the user documentation and examples in the codebase and on the website (I think that we can all cheer for that one!) On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 6:56 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > Agreed on the