On Sunday, Neil Toronto wrote:
> How do I close pull requests made to the plt/racket repo on GitHub?
> Am I authorized to do that in the first place?
You can't. The reason for this is that our github repo is just a
mirror, and they don't have a way to let people edit issues and pull
requests whil
I agree with the proposal.
And source-code auto formtting is also useful.
2012. 11. 23. 오전 9:29에 "Nadeem Abdul Hamid" 님이 작성:
> Hello all,
>
> I've been discussing with Robby a possible improvement of DrRacket's
> "automatic parentheses" behavior and would like to get a sense of others'
> general o
Just now, Robby Findler wrote:
>
> But my emacs nowadays works fine with unicode (and I long ago gave
> up on trying to maintain an .emacs file so I just get the defaults).
Heh -- yes, it handles unicode fine, but the real problem is typing
it. There are input modes that allow you to type greek
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> Yesterday, Neil Toronto wrote:
>> Rho! Cute!
>
> (As much as I like using non-ascii in code now, having a useful Emacs
> hack to do that (ρ ρ ρ your ⊥), I think that there are a significant
> number of people who would just avoid using a libra
Yesterday, Neil Toronto wrote:
> Rho! Cute!
(As much as I like using non-ascii in code now, having a useful Emacs
hack to do that (ρ ρ ρ your ⊥), I think that there are a significant
number of people who would just avoid using a library that requires
them...)
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (la
Yesterday, Neil Toronto wrote:
> Without extra assumptions, it's impossible to tell what's supposed
> to be an element and what's supposed to be a row. For example, this
> is ambiguous:
>
>(array ((list 1 2)))
>
> It could be a one-dimensional array containing just '(1 2), or a 1x3
> array co
7 hours ago, Robby Findler wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Laurent wrote:
> >
> > I think it would already be good enough to only consider the case
> > where the user types the paren and wants to remove them
> > immediately (e.g., he placed them in the wrong place, or wanted
> > square b
> Yes, I believe Eclipse does something like this too, maybe not with such
a visual sort of indication. I agree that it's very cool functionality but
it requires really thorough tracking > of some hidden state as Robby says
(history of the users' key and/or mouse interaction) and I don't think I'm
Hi All,
I notice that there a few old pull requests on Github without any
form of comments. Even a "we will look at this later" comment
looks better to out siders, than none at all.
https://github.com/plt/racket/pulls
Any thoughts?
/Jens Axel
_
Racket Developers li
Hi All,
I have written an implementation of bit vectors intended to be part of
the data collection.
https://github.com/plt/racket/pull/176
Any comments on the implementation and documentation are welcome.
The bit vector is represented as a vector of fixnums (packaged in a
struct of course).
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Grant Rettke wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Nick Shelley wrote:
>
>> I sort of like this behavior, and the visual difference gets rid of any
>> potential confusion.
>>
>
> Just an idea... you might duplicate Paredit's functionality:
>
> http://emacswi
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Nick Shelley wrote:
> For what it's worth, Xcode differentiates these cases by inserting a
> temporary closing paren that is gray instead of black. You can make it
> permanent by arrowing over it, typing it yourself, tabbing over it, or just
> moving the cursor ou
For what it's worth, Xcode differentiates these cases by inserting a
temporary closing paren that is gray instead of black. You can make it
permanent by arrowing over it, typing it yourself, tabbing over it, or just
moving the cursor outside the matching parens. When it becomes permanent it
is blac
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Laurent wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Nadeem Abdul Hamid wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 4:03 AM, Laurent wrote:
>>>
>>> If you can, I think it would be a good idea to remove the paren pair if
>>> the user deletes the opening paren he just
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Nadeem Abdul Hamid wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 4:03 AM, Laurent wrote:
>
>> If you can, I think it would be a good idea to remove the paren pair if
>> the user deletes the opening paren he just typed by mistake. Undo should do
>> the same (which apparently i
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 4:03 AM, Laurent wrote:
> If you can, I think it would be a good idea to remove the paren pair if
> the user deletes the opening paren he just typed by mistake. Undo should do
> the same (which apparently it does not currently; missing
> 'begin/end-edit-sequence' ?).
Yea
If you can, I think it would be a good idea to remove the paren pair if the
user deletes the opening paren he just typed by mistake. Undo should do the
same (which apparently it does not currently; missing
'begin/end-edit-sequence' ?).
Laurent
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 1:20 AM, Nadeem Abdul Hamid
17 matches
Mail list logo
