Michał,
Just though I'd mention that objects implementing Distributed don't need
to implement Serializable.
Cheers,
Peter.
On 18/03/2014 11:18 PM, Michał Kłeczek wrote:
Thanks Peter,
There is no need to rush with it yet.
I need to run it locally first :-)
But it would be good to have
I'll get a branch build up and running on Hudson for this soon.
Regards,
Peter.
- Original message -
Folks,
I've attached a first patch to River-436.
IMHO the idea is really sound - fixing several issues with River and
creating several new possibilities.
I am more than eager
Thanks Peter,
There is no need to rush with it yet.
I need to run it locally first :-)
But it would be good to have branch for it so that it is easier to resolve
conflicts.
Regards,
On Tuesday 18 of March 2014 22:31:08 Peter wrote:
I'll get a branch build up and running on Hudson for this
Folks,
I've attached a first patch to River-436.
IMHO the idea is really sound - fixing several issues with River and creating
several new possibilities.
I am more than eager to discuss it and compare to alternatives.
Note that the code is not really production-grade (yet). I've attached it
