Hi
I think the capability here really says „this bundle implements Sightly
Language Spec 1.1“ And since this spec is outside of Sling at [1] and commonly
referred to as sightly.io I would think we should be using a namespace which
matches the Sightly Language Spec and is not implementation spec
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 6:33 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> By analogy with
> http://www.osgi.org/Specifications/ReferenceNamespaces, should we
> agree on a prefix such as "org.apache.sling.capability.MMM" for our
> capability names, where MMM is the module name like "sightly"?
I d
Hi,
By analogy with
http://www.osgi.org/Specifications/ReferenceNamespaces, should we
agree on a prefix such as "org.apache.sling.capability.MMM" for our
capability names, where MMM is the module name like "sightly"?
-Bertrand
