Hi Spamassassin Developers,
I think I have a problem where my ISP DNS servers are being blocked by
various DNSBLs, and when that happens Spamassassin starts letting
through a lot of obvious spam messages.
However, it was somewhat difficult to debug this. I had to ask the
Spamassassin Users mailin
Thanks for the replies.
Should I open a bugzilla bug for this?
I remember seeing URIBL_BLOCKED once.
But lately it doesn't appear. I'm not sure what would go in "|| etc."
By the way I have a question on Stack Exchange about the correct bind
configuration etc., with no answers
RW, I'm not really understanding you either. You seem to enjoy keeping
people guessing...
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 06:46:16PM +, RW wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 08:38:44 -0800 (PST)
> John Hardin wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 24 Jan 2017, RW wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 00:04:16 -0800
> > > fr
Hi Marc,
No I've already done that. The confusing part for me about RW's email
was that he criticized my proposed solution without acknowledging the
problem it was trying to solve. Simply saying "it's not sensible"
doesn't tell us where to go from here. Usually people propose an
alternative soluti
Hi,
When calling message_dump with a NULL m argument, m is checked against
being NULL before calling message write, but m is derefenced in the
libspamc_log call below.
The patch below just returns if 'm' is NULL.
Regards,
Frederik
diff --git a/spamc/libspamc.c b/spamc/libspamc.c
ind
r be OK?
Regards,
Frederik
>
> Regards,
> KAM
>
> On 3/24/2011 2:54 PM, Frederik Deweerdt wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >When calling message_dump with a NULL m argument, m is checked against
> >being NULL before calling message write, but m is derefenced in the
> &g
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 04:51:58PM -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> On 3/24/2011 4:30 PM, Frederik Deweerdt wrote:
> >Hi Kevin,
> >
> >On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 03:47:25PM -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> >>If it were me and this race condition occurred, shouldn
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 06:16:20PM -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> On 3/24/2011 5:36 PM, Frederik Deweerdt wrote:
> >On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 04:51:58PM -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> >>On 3/24/2011 4:30 PM, Frederik Deweerdt wrote:
> >>>Hi Kevin,
> >>&g
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 11:30:40PM +0100, Frederik Deweerdt wrote:
[...]
> >
> > Can you open a bug at https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/?
> In process, I'll post the bug # back.
Here: Bug 6562 - Possible NULL deref in message_dump()
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssa
great job filtering my
email. I'm just mentioning some things that I think would be helpful
from an interface standpoint.
Frederik
my setup
much more than would a few spam status headers (and the message gets
new headers every time it goes through an MTA anyway, so it's not like
the headers are untouchable).
Thanks.
Frederik
--
http://ofb.net/~frederik/
nding anyway. :-)
On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 08:10:12AM +1300, Sidney Markowitz wrote:
> Frederik Eaton wrote:
> > Is it possible to configure spamassassin to get back the original
> > functionality of only modifying headers of spam
>
> 1. Look up the doc on rewrite_header and re
Yes, the version I have installed is 3.0.2.
On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 02:19:23PM +1300, Sidney Markowitz wrote:
> Frederik Eaton wrote:
> > As developers, you might want to add that information to the
> > part of the man page I quoted
>
> I assume that you are referring to th
> 2. Any further questions about this or similar topics should be directed
> to the SpamAssassin users mailing list, not to here. This list is for
> developer discussions only. Don't even reply to this with an apology or
> a thank you. I'll pretend that you have replied politely and leave it at
> t
t, has it been tried?
Frederik
--
http://ofb.net/~frederik/
weights properly. I'm also not sure about how things might change in a
situation where misclassification costs are asymmetrical as with spam
classification.
Frederik
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 01:25:16PM -0700, Daniel Quinlan wrote:
> Frederik Eaton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
16 matches
Mail list logo
