There was a discussion in April 2010 regarding the "fix" for issue 2753.
http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2010-04/0277.shtml
Unfortunately the discussion died due to lack of other opinions. I think Mike
had some very important input here and I believe that this concluding statement
is incorrect:
> -Original Message-
> From: danie...@apache.org [mailto:danie...@apache.org]
> Sent: donderdag 18 oktober 2012 00:22
> To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: svn commit: r1399462 - in /subversion/trunk:
> subversion/libsvn_client/ subversion/libsvn_subr/ subversion/libsvn_wc/
> sub
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 3:31 PM, wrote:
> Author: stsp
> Date: Thu Oct 18 11:31:20 2012
> New Revision: 1399582
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1399582&view=rev
> Log:
> * subversion/libsvn_ra_serf/util_error.c: Include ra_serf.h which contains
>prototypes for functions implemented
Hi all,
Currently svnadmin verify would stop verification process once an
error/corruption is found in the repo. It does not go till the HEAD of
the repo to see if there are further corruptions/errors.
It would be helpful if "--force" switch would do this.
Attaching a patch and the log messa
> -Original Message-
> From: Prabhu Gnana Sundar [mailto:prabh...@collab.net]
> Sent: donderdag 18 oktober 2012 17:05
> To: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: [PATCH] Implement svnadmin verify --force
>
> Hi all,
>
> Currently svnadmin verify would stop verification process once an
>
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 08:35:03PM +0530, Prabhu Gnana Sundar wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Currently svnadmin verify would stop verification process once an
> error/corruption is found in the repo. It does not go till the HEAD
> of the repo to see if there are further corruptions/errors.
>
> It would be
Stefan Sperling wrote:
> Prabhu Gnana Sundar wrote:
>> Currently svnadmin verify would stop verification process once an
>> error/corruption is found in the repo. It does not go till the HEAD
>> of the repo to see if there are further corruptions/errors.
>>
>> It would be helpful if "--force"
Would it be useful to copy this explanation somewhere more discoverable --
somewhere in the source tree, or linked from the release notes page?
- Julian
Philip Martin wrote:
> Johan Corveleyn writes:
>
>> With this new "exclusive" mode it's probably quite clear (no
>> parallellism possible
I (Julian Foad) wrote:
> Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> Hey Julian, are you still planning to rename these APIs from "symmetric"
>> to "automatic" merge? I think "automatic" is a much better term to use
>> because it is somewhat easier to understand from the user's perspective.
>> Especially fo
Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>> Author: stsp
>> Date: Thu Oct 18 11:31:20 2012
>> New Revision: 1399582
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1399582&view=rev
>> Log:
>> * subversion/libsvn_ra_serf/util_error.c: Include ra_serf.h which contains
>> prototypes for functions implemented in thi
On 17.10.2012 13:53, Stefan Küng wrote:
> On 17.10.2012 18:20, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
>> Anyway, I was just wondering what folks feelings were about this
>> possibility, and whether it's finally time to start thinking about
>> proper regex support within Subversion.
>
> I'm wondering: if C++ is an o
> Author: cmpilato
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1398983&view=rev
> Log:
> Reintegrate into trunk the 'http-dynamic-prop-namespaces' branch
> (using a simple 'svn merge BRANCH-URL' with a trunk@HEAD client!).
> Modified: subversion/trunk/subversion/mod_dav_svn/deadprops.c
> +static dav_
Stefan Fuhrmann wrote on Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 02:56:15 +0200:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:55 AM, Daniel Shahaf
> wrote:
>
> > stef...@apache.org wrote on Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 21:34:22 -:
> > > Author: stefan2
> > > Date: Sun Jun 10 21:34:21 2012
> > > New Revision: 1348666
> > >
> > > URL: h
Just added this comment to issue #1971[1] (aka "certain property names cause
non-wf XML responses", aka "the thing that spun cmpilato off on this
extensible property namespace business"):
{{{
Oh, man. Maybe this whole venture was ill-conceived. I just remembered the
other restrictions on XML Nam
Stefan Fuhrmann wrote on Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 02:26:13 +0200:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 1:57 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>
> > Branko Čibej wrote on Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 23:51:43 -0400:
> > > On 15.10.2012 17:14, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
> > > > However, if you have a long-running process like a server
Stefan Fuhrmann wrote on Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 02:26:13 +0200:
> No need to go off on a hyperbole. Raise your
> concerns in a factual way and hold off meta-
> discussion until after those facts got confirmed.
>
> Still appreciate the review, though. And, yes, the
> coded logic may contain holes and
Prabhu Gnana Sundar wrote on Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 20:35:03 +0530:
> Hi all,
>
> Currently svnadmin verify would stop verification process once an
> error/corruption is found in the repo. It does not go till the HEAD of
> the repo to see if there are further corruptions/errors.
>
Why is
r=0
Fixed all in r1399466 and r1399860. Thanks for the review.
Bert Huijben wrote on Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 13:45:46 +0200:
> > + SVN_ERR(svn_stream_close(lsbinfo));
> >if (err)
> > {
> >svn_error_clear(err);
>
> This replaces one error leak by another one.
>
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:00 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Prabhu Gnana Sundar wrote on Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 20:35:03 +0530:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Currently svnadmin verify would stop verification process once an
> > error/corruption is found in the repo. It does not go till the HEAD of
> > the repo t
Julian Foad wrote on Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 21:17:09 +0100:
> > Author: cmpilato
>
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1398983&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Reintegrate into trunk the 'http-dynamic-prop-namespaces' branch
> > (using a simple 'svn merge BRANCH-URL' with a trunk@HEAD client!).
>
> > Mo
Stefan Fuhrmann wrote on Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 23:20:45 +0200:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:00 PM, Daniel Shahaf
> wrote:
>
> > Prabhu Gnana Sundar wrote on Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 20:35:03 +0530:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Currently svnadmin verify would stop verification process once an
> > > error/
Regarding this issue: http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3311
We don't support using --depth options other than infinity with
externals. Bert mentions that wc-ng should make it easier to
implement this.
However, given the way svn:externals can be defined I think that it's
really
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
> Regarding this issue: http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3311
>
> We don't support using --depth options other than infinity with
> externals. Bert mentions that wc-ng should make it easier to
> implement this.
>
> However, give
Stefan Fuhrmann writes:
>> Why is
>>
>> r=0
>> HEAD=$(svnlook youngest $repos)
>> while [ $r -le $HEAD ]; do
>> svnadmin verify -r$r $repos
>> r=$(($r + 1))
>> done
>>
>> not an option?
>>
>
> It will not report multiple issues with the same revision
> (e.g. predecessor revision m
Philip Martin wrote on Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 23:32:15 +0100:
> Stefan Fuhrmann writes:
>
> >> Why is
> >>
> >> r=0
> >> HEAD=$(svnlook youngest $repos)
> >> while [ $r -le $HEAD ]; do
> >> svnadmin verify -r$r $repos
> >> r=$(($r + 1))
> >> done
> >>
> >> not an option?
> >>
> >
>
Arfrever, Jaroslaw, Karol: you have been involved in po: pl translation
for Subversion. Can you look at Jakub's report here and fix whatever
needs to be fixed? (This is a fwd from http://bugs.debian.org/690815 .)
Thanks,
Peter
[Jakub Wilk]
> po/pl.po has this message:
>
> msgstr "--- Łączenie
Sorry for the delay,
I have logged this in the issue tracker;
http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4248
It is Issue # 4248
Gavin.
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name]
> Sent: Tuesday, 16 October 2012 11:40
> To: Raphael Kubo da Costa
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:30 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
> Regarding this issue: http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3311
>
> We don't support using --depth options other than infinity with
> externals. Bert mentions that wc-ng should make it easier to
> implement this.
>
> However, giv
2012-10-19 00:45:28 Peter Samuelson napisał(a):
> Arfrever, Jaroslaw, Karol: you have been involved in po: pl translation
> for Subversion. Can you look at Jakub's report here and fix whatever
> needs to be fixed? (This is a fwd from http://bugs.debian.org/690815 .)
>
> Thanks,
> Peter
>
> [Jak
I didn't see this reported in the bug database, nor did a casual web search
turn this up:
When de-duplication is enabled on a Windows Server 2012 NTFS volume, the
de-duplication engine replaces files that contain duplicate data with reparse
points. Subversion then reports that those files have
30 matches
Mail list logo
