Re: officially retire 1.9?

2019-08-16 Thread Julian Foad
Daniel Shahaf wrote: What's 1.9's new end-of-life date, then? Until what (past or future) date do we _commit_ to backporting critical fixes? The release date of the next LTS release. According to the currently planned release cycles, that will be v1.14 in April 2020. (It might be affected b

Re: officially retire 1.9?

2019-08-16 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Julian Foad wrote on Fri, 16 Aug 2019 09:47 +00:00: > Stefan Sperling wrote: > > [...] > But the amount of work involved in everyone else running tests and > signing > > releases must also be considered. We barely made the required signature > > count > > for our last 3 releases. Focussing our vo

Re: officially retire 1.9?

2019-08-16 Thread Julian Foad
Stefan Sperling wrote: [...] > But the amount of work involved in everyone else running tests and signing releases must also be considered. We barely made the required signature count for our last 3 releases. Focussing our volunteer resources on releases that are actually used by Debian and Red

Re: officially retire 1.9?

2019-08-15 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 03:40:50PM +0100, Julian Foad wrote: > Branko Čibej wrote: > > On 05.08.2019 20:27, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > > Subversion 1.9.0 is 4 years old today (release on August 5 2015). > > > http://subversion.apache.org/roadmap.html#release-planning says that > > > each LTS releas

Re: officially retire 1.9?

2019-08-12 Thread Julian Foad
Branko Čibej wrote: On 05.08.2019 20:27, Stefan Sperling wrote: Subversion 1.9.0 is 4 years old today (release on August 5 2015). http://subversion.apache.org/roadmap.html#release-planning says that each LTS release is supported for 4 years. Julian said on IRC that perhaps we decided to support

Re: officially retire 1.9?

2019-08-06 Thread Branko Čibej
On 05.08.2019 20:27, Stefan Sperling wrote: > Subversion 1.9.0 is 4 years old today (release on August 5 2015). > http://subversion.apache.org/roadmap.html#release-planning says that > each LTS release is supported for 4 years. > > Julian said on IRC that perhaps we decided to support 2 LTS release

Re: officially retire 1.9?

2019-08-05 Thread Mark Phippard
On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 2:27 PM Stefan Sperling wrote: > Those two operating systems have always been the ones shipping the > oldest possible SVN release, as far as I can remember. So if they don't > need Subversion 1.9, I don't see any reason for us to support it beyond > its 4 years lifetime pro

officially retire 1.9?

2019-08-05 Thread Stefan Sperling
Subversion 1.9.0 is 4 years old today (release on August 5 2015). http://subversion.apache.org/roadmap.html#release-planning says that each LTS release is supported for 4 years. Julian said on IRC that perhaps we decided to support 2 LTS releases for either 4 years or until another LTS release app