On 5 January 2015 at 15:43, Stefan Fuhrmann
wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>>
>> On 2 January 2015 at 15:43, wrote:
>> > Author: stefan2
>> > Date: Fri Jan 2 12:43:42 2015
>> > New Revision: 1649012
>> >
>> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1649012
>> > Log:
>> > Merge
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On 2 January 2015 at 15:43, wrote:
> > Author: stefan2
> > Date: Fri Jan 2 12:43:42 2015
> > New Revision: 1649012
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1649012
> > Log:
> > Merge branches/fsx-id in /trunk, remove the BRANCH-README and
> > res
On 02.01.2015 14:24, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On 2 January 2015 at 15:43, wrote:
>> Author: stefan2
>> Date: Fri Jan 2 12:43:42 2015
>> New Revision: 1649012
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1649012
>> Log:
>> Merge branches/fsx-id in /trunk, remove the BRANCH-README and
>> resolve trivial conflict
On 02.01.2015 14:24, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On 2 January 2015 at 15:43, wrote:
>> Author: stefan2
>> Date: Fri Jan 2 12:43:42 2015
>> New Revision: 1649012
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1649012
>> Log:
>> Merge branches/fsx-id in /trunk, remove the BRANCH-README and
>> resolve trivial conflict
Philip Martin writes:
> My mistake, I was looking at libsvn_fs_fs/fs.h in my tree and saw the
> rename, but it occurred later in r1649062.
Should be "looking at libsvn_fs_x/fs.h"
--
Philip
Ivan Zhakov writes:
> On 2 January 2015 at 18:59, Philip Martin wrote:
>> Ivan Zhakov writes:
>>
>>> Do I understand correctly that you have merged branch without
>>> resolving concerns about dirent_t structure naming raised dev@ list
>>> two weeks ago [1] ?
>>
>> The names appear to have been
On 2 January 2015 at 18:59, Philip Martin wrote:
> Ivan Zhakov writes:
>
>> Do I understand correctly that you have merged branch without
>> resolving concerns about dirent_t structure naming raised dev@ list
>> two weeks ago [1] ?
>
> The names appear to have been changed (dirent_t to svn_fs_x__
Ivan Zhakov writes:
> Do I understand correctly that you have merged branch without
> resolving concerns about dirent_t structure naming raised dev@ list
> two weeks ago [1] ?
The names appear to have been changed (dirent_t to svn_fs_x__dirent_t)
as part of the merge commit.
--
Philip Martin |
On 2 January 2015 at 15:43, wrote:
> Author: stefan2
> Date: Fri Jan 2 12:43:42 2015
> New Revision: 1649012
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1649012
> Log:
> Merge branches/fsx-id in /trunk, remove the BRANCH-README and
> resolve trivial conflicts.
Stefan,
Do I understand correctly that you hav
9 matches
Mail list logo