Re: [dev] [surf] Using more memory than firefox

2015-06-22 Thread hiro
well, google for /etc/polipo/forbidden adblock On 6/4/15, Ivan Tham wrote: > On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 08:32:42PM +0200, hiro wrote: >>Does your polipo cache https traffic? > > Thanks, I just found out that polipo doesn't cache https traffic but > some other cache server does. > >>If you know what

Re: [dev] [surf] Using more memory than firefox

2015-06-03 Thread Ivan Tham
On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 08:32:42PM +0200, hiro wrote: Does your polipo cache https traffic? Thanks, I just found out that polipo doesn't cache https traffic but some other cache server does. If you know what /etc/hosts is and how polipo does it's dns requests you should be able to figure out

Re: [dev] [surf] Using more memory than firefox

2015-06-03 Thread tautolog
See my previous mailing list messages for details. I keep my local repo here: ‎https://github.com/legitparty/surf-isolated Ben   Original Message   From: Eric Pruitt Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2015 11:53 AM To: dev mail list Reply To: dev mail list Subject: Re: [dev] [surf] Using more memory than

Re: [dev] [surf] Using more memory than firefox

2015-06-03 Thread Eric Pruitt
On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 01:34:28PM -0700, tauto...@gmail.com wrote: > I use surf with patches to isolate processes by origin domain. All of these > fancy new cache attacks don't work because my browser process and profile is > limited to the origin domain. The CSS :visited hack for snooping my brow

Re: [dev] [surf] Using more memory than firefox

2015-06-03 Thread hiro
Does your polipo cache https traffic? If you know what /etc/hosts is and how polipo does it's dns requests you should be able to figure out your question yourself :)

Re: [dev] [surf] Using more memory than firefox

2015-06-03 Thread Teodoro Santoni
On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 10:29:32AM +0800, Ivan Tham wrote: > > Why can't surf beat dillo which is a gecko-based browser? Hi, dillo uses its own internal layout engine. If you wish to compare fairly dillo and surf you have to load surf without javascript: surf deals with scripts, where dillo afai

Re: [dev] [surf] Using more memory than firefox

2015-06-02 Thread Alex Pilon
On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 10:29:32AM +0800, Ivan Tham wrote: > Why can't surf beat dillo which is a gecko-based browser? Are you sure? From both the Wikipedia and the project page, given what features they are talking about implementing, as well as for lack of Gecko references, it doesn't seem so.

Re: [dev] [surf] Using more memory than firefox

2015-06-02 Thread Ivan Tham
On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 01:34:28PM -0700, tauto...@gmail.com wrote: When I look at top, I see a lot of memory usage, but most of that is shared mappings. What I look at is the active memory use, and virtual memory statistics, to see what is going on with memory. The only performance issue I de

Re: [dev] [surf] Using more memory than firefox

2015-06-02 Thread tautolog
Tuesday, June 2, 2015 7:37 AM To: dev@suckless.org Reply To: dev mail list Subject: Re: [dev] [surf] Using more memory than firefox On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 09:54:46AM -0700, tauto...@gmail.com wrote: >Hi Ivan, >Also, I prefer to isolate state between different browser windows/tabs. ‎If >f

Re: [dev] [surf] Using more memory than firefox

2015-06-02 Thread stanio
* Ivan Tham 2015-06-02 16:37 > Extra: How do I open a link in surf using the keyboard in the current > window and in a new window? vanilla surf: when carret browsing is active, you may search for the link's text and press enter (opens in the current window). otherwise: look at the surf.suckless

Re: [dev] [surf] Using more memory than firefox

2015-06-02 Thread Ivan Tham
On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 09:54:46AM -0700, tauto...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Ivan, Also, I prefer to isolate state between different browser windows/tabs. ‎If firefox is sharing process state between windows, and saving memory usage that way, then I see it as a security design issue.  Hi, Is there

Re: [dev] [surf] Using more memory than firefox

2015-06-01 Thread tautolog
, and saving memory usage that way, then I see it as a security design issue.  Ben   Original Message   From: Ivan Tham Sent: Monday, June 1, 2015 8:23 AM To: dev@suckless.org Reply To: dev mail list Subject: Re: [dev] [surf] Using more memory than firefox On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 04:14:36PM +0100

Re: [dev] [surf] Using more memory than firefox

2015-06-01 Thread Ivan Tham
On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 04:14:36PM +0100, Raphaël Proust wrote: Hi, I use 2 windows of surf uses more memory then using firefox with 6 tabs opened. Is there some memory leaks? Open the six exact tabs of your FF in surf and compare that. Open the two pages from your surf into your FF and compare

Re: [dev] [surf] Using more memory than firefox

2015-06-01 Thread Raphaël Proust
On 1 June 2015 at 16:10, Ivan Tham wrote: > Hi, I use 2 windows of surf uses more memory then using firefox with 6 tabs > opened. Is there some memory leaks? Open the six exact tabs of your FF in surf and compare that. Open the two pages from your surf into your FF and compare that. Some pages o

[dev] [surf] Using more memory than firefox

2015-06-01 Thread Ivan Tham
Hi, I use 2 windows of surf uses more memory then using firefox with 6 tabs opened. Is there some memory leaks? -- _ < Do what you like, like what you do. > - \ ^__^ \ (oo)\___ (__)\ )\/