Hi Devs,
I just checked out the taglibs source code from
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/taglibs/standard/trunk and try to
replace the sun implementation in my build.
But the first problem jumped in is that I can not even build it. Because
maven can not find its parent pom:
org.apach
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11248
--- Comment #2 from Artem Anisimov 2010-09-25 02:26:57 EDT
---
Created an attachment (id=26072)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26072)
Patch that allows specifying expiration period for static content.
--
Confi
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50001
Wesley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #26070|application/octet-stream|text/plain
mime type|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49955
--- Comment #3 from Wesley 2010-09-24 22:11:55 EDT
---
Created an attachment (id=26071)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26071)
Patch based on current svn to change to correct main class.
--
Configure bugmail: h
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50001
Summary: Eclipse source files don't belong in project root.
Product: Tomcat 7
Version: trunk
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priorit
> From: Wesley Acheson [mailto:wesley.ache...@gmail.com]
> Subject: Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4] New: More bugs
> And the veto wars? and regressions?
Haven't seen a veto war in quite a while.
There are lots of regressions, but they're most confined to trunk, not anything
users would normally s
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 11:59 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wrote:
> On 9/24/2010 4:55 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>>> From: Wesley Acheson [mailto:wesley.ache...@gmail.com]
>>> Subject: Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4] New: More bugs
>>
>>> Pardon my language but WTF?
>>
>> I think Mr Rowe is actually
On 9/24/2010 4:55 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>> From: Wesley Acheson [mailto:wesley.ache...@gmail.com]
>> Subject: Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4] New: More bugs
>
>> Pardon my language but WTF?
>
> I think Mr Rowe is actually issuing a compliment to the sterling efforts of
> Mark T, albeit i
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4
--- Comment #1 from William A. Rowe Jr. 2010-09-24 17:58:06
EDT ---
One additional correction;
Although we might credit markt with mopping away many bugzilla issues, but in
all fairness, credit or blame for the lack of Tomcat reports lan
> From: Wesley Acheson [mailto:wesley.ache...@gmail.com]
> Subject: Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4] New: More bugs
> Pardon my language but WTF?
I think Mr Rowe is actually issuing a compliment to the sterling efforts of
Mark T, albeit in a somewhat facetious manner. I'm surprised he didn't wait
Pardon my language but WTF?
please don't respond GIYF.
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 11:35 PM, wrote:
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4
>
> Summary: More bugs
> Product: Tomcat 5
> Version: 5.5.31
> Platform: All
> OS/Version: All
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4
William A. Rowe Jr. changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4
Summary: More bugs
Product: Tomcat 5
Version: 5.5.31
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Catalina
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49998
Summary: ParserController.hasJspRoot() does not detect JSP as
using XML syntax if namespace declaration
uses ' delimiters instead of "
Product: Tomcat 6
Version: 6.0.2
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48674
--- Comment #5 from Chuck Caldarale 2010-09-24
16:16:06 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Is this worth continuing with? I know its rough but I'd like to know if its a
> start again job, or continue from here.
I definitely think it's wo
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48674
--- Comment #4 from Wesley 2010-09-24 16:03:43 EDT
---
Is this worth continuing with? I know its rough but I'd like to know if its a
start again job, or continue from here.
Wes
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/u
Mark,
On 9/20/2010 6:58 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 20/09/2010 15:04, Wesley Acheson wrote:
>> I think some documentation should be created on code style. Actually a
>> bit more than that I think some documentation should be written
>> saying.
>
> http://tomcat.apache.org/getinvolved.html
>
> A
On 24 September 2010 07:00, wrote:
> Author: mturk
> Date: Fri Sep 24 06:00:00 2010
> New Revision: 1000718
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1000718&view=rev
> Log:
> Fix Bz #49993 by checking the JAVA_HOME/JRE_HOME environment variables
>
> Modified:
> tomcat/trunk/bin/service.bat
>
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49994
--- Comment #1 from Gurkan Erdogdu 2010-09-24
08:00:08 EDT ---
Comments from David Jencks:
For reference, the EE 6 platform spec explains that usually a new instance
should be returned on each lookup in section 5.2.4 page 67 "Sharing of
E
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49994
Summary: NamingContext Possible Bug
Product: Tomcat 7
Version: trunk
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Compone
Konstatin,
I think that this is not related with ResourceLink elements. When you define
global resource link in your Context.xml, Tomcat creates ResourceLinkRef for
this entry. Then same scenario exists, it creates object using
ResourceLinkFactory and caches it. It is not desirable. Changing (r
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49890
Andrey Timofeev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
--
Configure bugmail: https:
22 matches
Mail list logo
