Re: Implementing MicroProfile 3.0

2019-09-23 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Awesome JL. Do you have some details about the breaking changes? Le mar. 24 sept. 2019 à 03:51, Jean-Louis Monteiro a écrit : > All right, created this one for health > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6752 > I have a fix for a bug in the way we handle producer > https://issues.a

Re: Implementing MicroProfile 3.0

2019-09-23 Thread Jean-Louis Monteiro
All right, created this one for health https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6752 I have a fix for a bug in the way we handle producer https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6753 Since we upgraded to health 2.0 and there are some breaking changes, I have bumped up the version to 2

Re: 7.1.x and 7.0.x releases

2019-09-23 Thread Jean-Louis Monteiro
I have opened this ticket and pushed a fix on both Java EE 7 and 8 API jar. New snapshot deployed. I'm waiting for the full build on master to pass and then I'll close the ticket and fire up the 2 releases so you can move on with TomEE -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http

Re: 7.1.x and 7.0.x releases

2019-09-23 Thread Jonathan Gallimore
Oh wow, that would be amazing! On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 10:49 PM Jonathan S. Fisher wrote: > I'll get a reproducer project put together that demos the bug. > > On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 4:32 PM Jonathan Gallimore < > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > If we can come up with some good tests

Re: 7.1.x and 7.0.x releases

2019-09-23 Thread Jonathan S. Fisher
I'll get a reproducer project put together that demos the bug. On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 4:32 PM Jonathan Gallimore < jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote: > If we can come up with some good tests for it, I don't see why not. > > Jon > > On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 10:25 PM Jonathan S. Fisher > wrote:

Re: 7.1.x and 7.0.x releases

2019-09-23 Thread Jonathan Gallimore
If we can come up with some good tests for it, I don't see why not. Jon On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 10:25 PM Jonathan S. Fisher wrote: > We've been running 7.0.x latest in prod for a few weeks with no issues > other than the ActiveMQ Failover protocol memory leak issue (which affects > all versions

Re: 7.1.x and 7.0.x releases

2019-09-23 Thread Jonathan S. Fisher
We've been running 7.0.x latest in prod for a few weeks with no issues other than the ActiveMQ Failover protocol memory leak issue (which affects all versions of TomEE). https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-6391 This is an issue now because our JMS Context / Connection Factories will actually

Re: 7.1.x and 7.0.x releases

2019-09-23 Thread Jean-Louis Monteiro
The Locator issue raised earlier today. Would be great to get the fix in before rolling. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 12:33 PM Jonathan Gallimore < jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm just doing some cleanup on t

7.1.x and 7.0.x releases

2019-09-23 Thread Jonathan Gallimore
I'm just doing some cleanup on these branches. I'm thinking its probably time we put out new releases as these branches have seen some fixes. Is there anything that we think is missing before I kick off some releases and votes? I'd like to get the quartz-openejb-shade update if possible - that ne

Re: [VOTE] Release quartz-openejb-shade 2.2.4

2019-09-23 Thread Jonathan Gallimore
Bumping this one up - this addresses a CVE (CVE-2019-13990 - https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2019-13990), and it would be good to release unless there are issues with it. Thanks Jon On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 4:58 PM Jean-Louis Monteiro wrote: > Looks good. > +1 > -- > Jean-Loui

Re: [DISCUSSION] Completing Jakarta EE 8 and MicroProfile 3.0: 8.0.x or 8.1.x?

2019-09-23 Thread Jonathan S. Fisher
I suggest sticking to semvar as much as possible. So an intentional API break change should be 9.x.x in that case. For Jakarta EE compliance work, 8.1.x would be my vote, as the changes should be backward compatible. On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 6:48 PM David Blevins wrote: > We need to do some anno