Re: [udk-dev] pyUNO bridge status ?

2006-10-27 Thread Joerg Budischewski
Hi, Well, not being a Python-savvy person at all, it seems that pyUNO needs to be adapted to each new version of OOo to support its new classes? If so, this will be an ongoing run-up to match both with each other? only when the component model UNO itself is extended or changes, pyuno needs to b

Re: [udk-dev] pyUNO bridge status ?

2006-10-24 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi there, >> yes, I am still there and will do bugfixes in general, currently >> there is one serious bug and a few minor bugs, which I am going to >> fix sometime in future ... > Thanks a lot > I'm happy toera that :) >> However, I currently can't give you much hope for future extensions, >> e.g.

Re: [udk-dev] pyUNO bridge status ?

2006-10-23 Thread Laurent Godard
Hi Joerg yes, I am still there and will do bugfixes in general, currently there is one serious bug and a few minor bugs, which I am going to fix sometime in future ... Thanks a lot I'm happy toera that :) However, I currently can't give you much hope for future extensions, e.g. - python

Re: [udk-dev] pyUNO bridge status ?

2006-10-23 Thread Joerg Budischewski
Hi, yes, I am still there and will do bugfixes in general, currently there is one serious bug and a few minor bugs, which I am going to fix sometime in future ... However, I currently can't give you much hope for future extensions, e.g. - python 2.5 - uno components that can be implemented w

[udk-dev] pyUNO bridge status ?

2006-10-18 Thread Laurent Godard
Hi all What is the python bridge status ? Does someone still maintain it ? Joerg ? Do you think a call for help would be needed for keeping pyUNO usable on a long run ? Laurent -- Laurent Godard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Ingénierie OpenOffice.org - http://www.indesko.com Nuxeo Enterprise Conten