Le jeudi 27 octobre 2016 09:55:09 UTC+2, Percy a écrit :
> So this is it? Qihoo can continue to get away with this MITM browser?
I'm afraid that can't be solved by Mozilla. Qihoo is free to sell or freely
distribute their browser.
___
dev-security-polic
"When facing any requirements of laws and regulations or any demands for
undergoing legal
process of court and other agencies, GDCA must provide confidential information
in this CP"
Can GDCA specify what other agencies are included? In China, many requests are
relayed simply through a phone cal
在 2016年10月27日星期四 UTC+8下午6:22:03，wangs...@gmail.com写道：
> 在 2016年10月27日星期四 UTC+8上午8:09:06，Peter Kurrasch写道：
> > I think these are both good points and my recommendation is that Mozilla
> > deny GDCA's request for inclusion.
> >
> >
> > We should not have to explain something as basic as document v
在 2016年10月28日星期五 UTC+8上午2:12:32，Percy写道：
> On Thursday, October 27, 2016 at 3:22:03 AM UTC-7, wangs...@gmail.com wrote:
> > 在 2016年10月27日星期四 UTC+8上午8:09:06，Peter Kurrasch写道：
> > > I think these are both good points and my recommendation is that Mozilla
> > > deny GDCA's request for inclusion.
> >
I have sent the email to the following CAs.
Root Owner | # Certs still to add to Salesforce
Actalis 2
Asseco Data Systems S.A. (previously Unizeto Certum)1
Atos3
Autoridad de Certificacion Firmaprofesional 6
Camerfirma 19
certSIGN6
China Internet Network Informatio
On Thursday, October 27, 2016 at 3:22:03 AM UTC-7, wangs...@gmail.com wrote:
> 在 2016年10月27日星期四 UTC+8上午8:09:06，Peter Kurrasch写道：
> > I think these are both good points and my recommendation is that Mozilla
> > deny GDCA's request for inclusion.
> >
> >
> > We should not have to explain something
On Thursday, October 27, 2016 at 4:14:35 AM UTC-7, Rob Stradling wrote:
> So, to ensure that no CA can claim that they didn't know, I'd like to
> see the "must keep disclosing intermediates to Salesforce on an ongoing
> basis" requirement explicitly stated:
> 1. in the next version of the Mozilla
On 27/10/16 09:31, Gervase Markham wrote:
> On 26/10/16 22:02, Kathleen Wilson wrote:
>> Please see
>> https://wiki.mozilla.org/CA:SalesforceCommunity#CA_Community_in_Salesforce
>> and let me know if you still think we need to add a sentence to the
>> wiki page stating that CAs are expected to ma
在 2016年10月27日星期四 UTC+8上午8:09:06，Peter Kurrasch写道：
> I think these are both good points and my recommendation is that Mozilla deny
> GDCA's request for inclusion.
>
>
> We should not have to explain something as basic as document versioning and
> version control. If GDCA can not demonstrate suff
On 26/10/16 18:53, Ryan Sleevi wrote:
> interpretation of #2. This is also why I support the mandatory
> disclosure of TCSCs to Mozilla Salesforce, to ensure that the
> Technical Constraints are properly implemented and conforming in
> order for the CA to claim its exclusion.
If we were to require
On 26/10/16 22:02, Kathleen Wilson wrote:
> I agree that I should add a section about that to
> https://wiki.mozilla.org/CA:SalesforceCommunity I don't agree that it
> needs to be resolved before reminding these particular CAs about
> their overdue action items. If they fall into that category, th
So this is it? Qihoo can continue to get away with this MITM browser?
___
dev-security-policy mailing list
dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy
12 matches
Mail list logo
