On Monday, January 27, 2014 4:35:34 PM UTC-7, Brian Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 10:49 AM, wrote:
>
> > On Monday, January 27, 2014 10:52:44 AM UTC-7, Brian Smith wrote:
>
> >> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 9:26 AM, wrote:
Thanks much Brian and Alan for the links - and the 800-52 referen
On Monday, January 27, 2014 10:52:44 AM UTC-7, Brian Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 9:26 AM, wrote:
>
> > On Monday, January 27, 2014 6:19:42 AM UTC-7, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>
> > 2) NIST is a US government standards board that drives a lot of compliance
>
> > regulation. There are
On Monday, January 27, 2014 6:19:42 AM UTC-7, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> I really recommend that you do read all the messages. All of this has >
> been discussed in various thread both here and on other lists.
>
> Ok - I will try (but it will be after this post).
>
> Other recommendations don't not
Hi,
So I didn't get to the bottom of this thread because some of it is 'loading'
but I didn't see any mention of NIST 800-131a in all the posts I saw.
This standard (along with NIST 800-57 Part 1) provides information about
security strength and what is required. Basically NIST is saying you sho
On Sunday, January 26, 2014 6:25:58 PM UTC-7, ripb...@aol.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So I didn't get to the bottom of this thread because some of it is 'loading'
> but I didn't see any mention of NIST 800-131a in all the posts I saw.
>
>
>
> This standard (along with NIST 800-57 Part 1) provides inf
Hi,
So I didn't get to the bottom of this thread because some of it is 'loading'
but I didn't see any mention of NIST 800-131a in all the posts I saw.
This standard (along with NIST 800-57 Part 1) provides information about
security strength and what is required. Basically NIST is saying you sho
6 matches
Mail list logo
