RE: Talked too early (dlr on at2)

> > when you set the wavecom not to deliver STATUS-REPORT > > using unsolicited codes, it does not do so at all. > > I'll fix a +CDS detection into AT2 and send an updated > > patch, in - lets say 30 mins ? > > Uhm, I don't know if this all we need. > Infact I have the +CDS only for the first sms

Re: Talked too early (dlr on at2)

> when you set the wavecom not to deliver STATUS-REPORT > using unsolicited codes, it does not do so at all. > I'll fix a +CDS detection into AT2 and send an updated > patch, in - lets say 30 mins ? Uhm, I don't know if this all we need. Infact I have the +CDS only for the first sms, then I don't

RE: Talked too early (dlr on at2)

Message- > From: Andrea Viscovich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 1:08 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: Oded Arbel > Subject: Talked too early (dlr on at2) > > > I should shut up my mouth. > I said it worked too early just because of seei

Talked too early (dlr on at2)

I should shut up my mouth. I said it worked too early just because of seeing a +CDS in the log. In the bearer log (only for the first sms) I suddendly have an 2002-08-14 11:42:06 [5] DEBUG: AT2[A]: <-- +CDS: 25 2002-08-14 11:42:06 [5] DEBUG: AT2[A]: <-- 0006270C91934397332602208041118342802080411