Aether license change

2011-01-31 Thread Stanislav Ochotnicky
Aether recently changed license from ASL 2.0 to EPL. I built it in rawhide a few days back, but forgot to send warning email here. Fixed now.. -- Stanislav Ochotnicky sochotni...@redhat.com Associate Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno PGP: 7B087241 Red Hat Inc.

Re: piklab fails to build in rawhide

2011-01-31 Thread Alain Portal
Le lundi 31 janvier 2011 04:20:56, Rex Dieter a écrit : Alain Portal wrote: piklab fails to build in rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2750261 and I don't know how to fix. Can somebody help me? As others have suggested, looks like a problem in qt3,

rawhide report: 20110131 changes

2011-01-31 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Mon Jan 31 08:15:29 UTC 2011 Broken deps for x86_64 -- beagle-0.3.9-19.fc14.x86_64 requires libmono.so.0()(64bit) beagle-0.3.9-19.fc14.x86_64 requires libmono.so.0(VER_1)(64bit)

Orphaning pmd

2011-01-31 Thread Jerry James
Hello all, I haven't used pmd for almost 2 years now. I think it is time to have somebody who does use it take over maintainership. There are no open bugs at this time. Also, I intended to package pmd-eclipse-plugin at some point, but never got around to it. Let me know if you want this

File Padre-0.80.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by ppisar

2011-01-31 Thread Petr Pisar
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Padre: f6ce1c1857a3fdb39b3bb50dd9ca57c2 Padre-0.80.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-Padre] 0.80 bump

2011-01-31 Thread Petr Pisar
commit f1da80ee3939302e4ef8735d0896faa755571218 Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com Date: Mon Jan 31 17:12:52 2011 +0100 0.80 bump .gitignore |1 + perl-Padre.spec | 104 +++--- sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 100

[Bug 673966] perl-Padre-0.80 is available

2011-01-31 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673966 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

Re: piklab fails to build in rawhide

2011-01-31 Thread Kevin Kofler
Alain Portal wrote: Unfortunately, another fail occurs at line 18004 of build.log: In file included from /builddir/build/BUILD/piklab-0.15.10/src/devices/pic/xml/pic_xml_to_data.cpp:13:0: /builddir/build/BUILD/piklab-0.15.10/src/xml_to_data/device_xml_to_data.h: In member function 'void

Re: Haskell packaging questions

2011-01-31 Thread Andrew McNabb
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 08:33:13AM +0530, lakshminaras2...@gmail.com wrote: The cabal2spec program generates the template for the .spec file from the .cabal file. Then the packager modifies certain values and thats about it. The macros used in the template come from /etc/rpm/macros.ghc. There

Re: piklab fails to build in rawhide

2011-01-31 Thread Alain Portal
Le lundi 31 janvier 2011 17:29:51, Kevin Kofler a écrit : I committed the trivial fix for you: Thanks! Please send the fix upstream. This will be done. Thanks guys. Alain signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -- devel mailing list

nxt_python API change - rename vs break?

2011-01-31 Thread Martin Langhoff
Hello list, Fedora currently ships nxt_python 0.7 (packaged by John McLean) -- a library to generate Lego NXT bytecode from python. The upstream library has moved forward under a new lead developer (Marcus Wanner, cc'd). The current code - nxt 2.0.1 - uses the same name, but breaks API.

Re: nxt_python API change - rename vs break?

2011-01-31 Thread Jonathan Dieter
On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 11:50 -0700, Martin Langhoff wrote: Hello list, Fedora currently ships nxt_python 0.7 (packaged by John McLean) -- a library to generate Lego NXT bytecode from python. snip - Work with John to upgrade nxt_python from 0.7 to 2.0.1, break with the past. Unclear whether

[Bug 672666] perl-PDF-API2-2.016 is available

2011-01-31 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672666 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added

Re: nxt_python API change - rename vs break?

2011-01-31 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Jonathan Dieter jdie...@lesbg.com wrote:  - Work with John to upgrade nxt_python from 0.7 to 2.0.1, break with the past. Unclear whether it is widely used (do we have anything like popcon?) I'd vote for this one with the proviso that the API break is only

Re: NetworkManager doesn't start on boot

2011-01-31 Thread Naheem Zaffar
There seems to be an SElinux denial for me which stops it from starting (I upgraded from Fedora 14 and its NOT a live machine). I would assume its the same error? On 31 January 2011 07:22, Braden McDaniel bra...@endoframe.com wrote: I've recently set up a virtual machine running rawhide and

Re: debugfs query

2011-01-31 Thread Pete Zaitcev
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 11:19:22 -0500 Kyle McMartin k...@mcmartin.ca wrote: On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 10:36:20AM +, Steven Whitehouse wrote: Currently Fedora doesn't automatically mount debugfs at boot time. So I thought that it might be worth asking whether this should be the case?

Re: debugfs query

2011-01-31 Thread Kyle McMartin
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 02:16:07PM -0700, Pete Zaitcev wrote: On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 11:19:22 -0500 Kyle McMartin k...@mcmartin.ca wrote: On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 10:36:20AM +, Steven Whitehouse wrote: Currently Fedora doesn't automatically mount debugfs at boot time. So I thought that

Multiple identical udev rules -- safe?

2011-01-31 Thread Martin Langhoff
Consider this file from nxt_python package: cat /etc/udev/rules.d/70-lego.rules BUS==usb, SYSFS{idVendor}==0694, GROUP=lego, MODE=0660 Is it safe sane to include an identical udev rule file in the nbc package with different filename? To state the obvious -- it'd use the same group name and

File version-0.88.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by mmaslano

2011-01-31 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-version: 5f27f21c625fa2f89f4130e277594635 version-0.88.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 228433] perl-version: EPEL branch?

2011-01-31 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=228433 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 672839] Upgrade perl(version) to 0.88

2011-01-31 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672839 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[perl-Sub-Exporter/el4/master] (9 commits) ...Merge branch 'el4' into el5

2011-01-31 Thread Paul Howarth
Summary of changes: 261317a... update to 0.972 (*) 4baa605... - update to 0.974 (*) df756c0... - update to 0.975 (*) 2803aac... Initialize branch EL-5 for perl-Sub-Exporter (*) a8e2c9f... Fix typo that causes a failure to update the common directo (*) f825ccd... dist-git conversion

[perl-Sub-Exporter/el4/master: 7/9] Revert to EL-5 version

2011-01-31 Thread Paul Howarth
commit 176c4a10a0e834efb9741e6c8339b534949b4665 Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org Date: Mon Jan 31 09:30:19 2011 + Revert to EL-5 version .gitignore |2 +- perl-Sub-Exporter.spec | 47 ++- sources|2

[perl-Sub-Exporter/el4/master: 8/9] Fix license, tweak for EL-4 compatibility

2011-01-31 Thread Paul Howarth
commit 6667f12813ad1c1a98cd34f5f8b02623886dff1a Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org Date: Mon Jan 31 09:27:01 2011 + Fix license, tweak for EL-4 compatibility .gitignore |2 +- perl-Sub-Exporter.spec |8 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

[perl-Sub-Exporter/el5/master] (19 commits) ...Merge branch 'el4' into el5

2011-01-31 Thread Paul Howarth
Summary of changes: cd81510... update to 0.972 (*) 219f28b... - update to 0.974 (*) e1d7b2f... - update to 0.975 (*) 8fa8924... Update to 0.978, fix license tag, rebuild for new perl (*) 2f6d737... perl rebuild, third small chain (*) c3c5994... - update to 0.979 - drop BR's on:

[perl-Sub-Exporter/el4/master: 9/9] Merge branch 'el4' into el5

2011-01-31 Thread Paul Howarth
commit beac20a026f371263954cdf9201c8cab50cb7dab Merge: 6667f12 176c4a1 Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org Date: Mon Jan 31 09:31:27 2011 + Merge branch 'el4' into el5 --- -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

Re: cpanspec - proposal of default behaviour

2011-01-31 Thread Petr Pisar
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 10:55:25AM -0600, Steven Pritchard wrote: On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 05:20:55PM +0100, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: I'd like to propose a change in default behaviour of cpanspec. There shouldn't be defined buildroot, called rm -rf in build phase, etc. These changes are

[Bug 228433] perl-version: EPEL branch?

2011-01-31 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=228433 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed: What|Removed |Added

File Feed-Find-0.07.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by psabata

2011-01-31 Thread Petr Sabata
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Feed-Find: 9235e3ca061d0beb9cf23cb579522669 Feed-Find-0.07.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-Feed-Find] v0.07 release bump

2011-01-31 Thread Petr Sabata
commit ca0ed004fdae036e9d847020b9eb816b5a0a8128 Author: Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com Date: Mon Jan 31 11:38:27 2011 +0100 v0.07 release bump .gitignore |1 + perl-Feed-Find.spec | 13 + sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 5

[Bug 673966] perl-Padre-0.80 is available

2011-01-31 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673966 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 228433] perl-version: EPEL branch?

2011-01-31 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=228433 --- Comment #8 from Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com 2011-01-31 05:45:27 EST --- You are right. Package Change Request

[Bug 673651] perl-Feed-Find-0.07 is available

2011-01-31 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673651 Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

Broken dependencies: perl-RPM2

2011-01-31 Thread buildsys
perl-RPM2 has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-RPM2-0.68-9.fc15.x86_64 requires librpmio.so.1()(64bit) perl-RPM2-0.68-9.fc15.x86_64 requires librpm.so.1()(64bit) On i386: perl-RPM2-0.68-9.fc15.i686 requires librpm.so.1

Broken dependencies: perl-Spreadsheet-WriteExcel

2011-01-31 Thread buildsys
perl-Spreadsheet-WriteExcel has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Spreadsheet-WriteExcel-2.37-4.fc15.noarch requires perl(Apache::URI) perl-Spreadsheet-WriteExcel-2.37-4.fc15.noarch requires perl(Apache::Request) On i386:

perl @INC (paths) again

2011-01-31 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
Hello, because some questions and blocked reviews [1]. I feel that we really need discuss our @INC paths once again. I wrote proposal, which is almost the same as was the one sent to the list few months ago [2]. This is only proposal and there are also other possibilities, how to create specific

Re: perl @INC (paths) again

2011-01-31 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 01/31/2011 04:21 PM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: Hello, because some questions and blocked reviews [1]. I feel that we really need discuss our @INC paths once again. Thanks for trying to launch such a discussion. I am blocking these reviews, because I feel redhat.cz has drawn uncommunicated,

Re: perl @INC (paths) again

2011-01-31 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
* Marcela Mašláňová [31/01/2011 16:57] : This is only proposal and there are also other possibilities, how to create specific directory for installation of users rpms. I'd like to change this proposal to FPC guidelines maybe for next Fedora, therefore I really like to know your opinions.